Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama

Chave, Jérôme, Condit, Richard, Lao, Suzanne, Caspersen, John P., Foster, Robin B., Hubbell, Stephen P.·2003·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: We estimated the dry, living, above‐ground biomass (AGB) standing stock and its turnover in a 50‐hectare forest plot located in moist tropical forest on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. The estimates were obtained using inventory data collected every 5 years from 1985 to 2000, including measurements of all trees ≥ 1 cm diameter. Four different allometric regressions relating trunk diameter and height with AGB were compared. Based on the most consistent method, we estimated that the Barro Colorado forest holds 281 ± 20 Mg ha−1(1 Mg = 10 3 kg) of AGB, lianas included. A third of the AGB is stored in trees larger than 70 cm in diameter. Stand‐level AGB increment (growth plus recruitment) was highest in the period 1985–90 (7.05 ± 0.32 Mg ha−1 year−1, mean ± 95% confidence limits based on samples of multiple hectares) and smallest in the period 1990–95 (5.25 ± 0.26 Mg ha−1 year−1), while AGB losses were similar during the three intervals (mean 5.43 ± 0.72 Mg ha−1 year−1). This resulted in significant differences in AGB change (defined as increment minus loss) among census intervals; including branchfalls, the AGB of Barro Colorado Island increased in 1985–90 (+0.82 ± 0.84 Mg ha−1 year−1), decreased in 1990–95 (−0.69 ± 0.82 Mg ha−1 year−1), and increased again in 1995–2000 (+0.45 ± 0.70 Mg ha−1 year−1). The 15‐year average was +0.20 Mg ha−1 year−1, but with a confidence interval that spanned zero (−0.68 to 0.63 Mg ha−1 year−1). Branchfalls and partial breakage of stems had a significant influence on the AGB changes. They contributed an average of 0.46 Mg ha−1 year−1 to the AGB loss. About 5% of AGB increment was due to trees less than 10 cm in diameter. To test whether the AGB of tropical forests is increasing due to climate change, we propose that in each forest type, at least 10 hectares of forest be inventoried, and that measurements of the small classes (< 10 cm diameter) as well as large size classes be included. Biomass loss due to crown damage should also be estimated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00757.x

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Chave, J., Condit, R., Lao, S., Caspersen, J. P., Foster, R. B., & Hubbell, S. P.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
240-252
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2066964530
Cited by
461
References
65
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00757.x
The paper
Chave, J., Condit, R., Lao, S., Caspersen, J. P., Foster, R. B., & Hubbell, S. P. (2003). Spatial and temporal variation of biomass in a tropical forest: results from a large census plot in Panama. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00757.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.