The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data
Open accessAbstract
This paper contains a strategy for estimating total aboveground biomass of tropical forests. We developed regression equations to estimate aboveground biomass of individual trees as a function of diameter at breast height, total height, wood density, and Holdridge life zone (sensu Holdridge 1967). The regressions are applied to some 5,300 trees from 43 independent sample plots, and 101 stand tables from large-scale forest inventories in four countries, to estimate commercial and total aboveground biomass per unit area by forest type, and to estimate expansion factors defined as the ratio of aboveground to commercial biomass. The quadratic stand diameter (QSD, i.e., the diameter of a tree of average basal area) in a given forest stand influences the magnitude of the expansion factor. Stands of small trees have large expansion factors (up to 6.4), and as QSD increases, the expansion factor decreases to a constant value (about 1.75). For undisturbed forests in moist, moist transition to dry, and dry life zones respectively, the expansion factors for total aboveground biomass were 1.74, 1.95, and 1.57 respectively. For undisturbed, logged, and nonproductive forest categories used by the FAO to report global commercial wood volume data, we estimated expansion factors of 1.75, 1.90, and 2.00 respectively. Applying these factors to FAO data results in a 28 to 47% increase in previous volume-derived estimates of tropical forest biomass. However, estimates of tropical forest biomass based on small destructive samples continue to be high relative to estimates based on volume data. For. Sci. 35(4):881-902.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems
Dixon, R. K., Solomon, A. M., Brown, S., Houghton, R. A., Trexier, M. C., & Wisniewski, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.263.5144.185 · Cited by 3,403
Self-citationMonitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality
Gibbs, H. K., Brown, S., Niles, J. O., & Foley, J. A. (2007) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045023 · Cited by 1,653
Self-citationFoody, G. M., Boyd, D. S., & Cutler, M. E. J. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00039-7 · Cited by 580
Spatial and temporal distribution of tropical biomass burning
Hao, W. M., & Liu, M. (1994) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb02086 · Cited by 528
Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests - A Review
T. Vashum, K. (2012) · Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography · doi:10.4172/2157-7625.1000116 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., & Lugo, A. E.
- Venue
- Forest Science
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 881-902
- ISSN
- 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3738
- OpenAlex
- W60310328
- Cited by
- 1,279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/forestscience/35.4.881
- The paper
- Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., & Lugo, A. E. (1989). Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data. Forest Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/35.4.881
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.