The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale
Abstract
1 A framework that summarizes the direct and indirect effects of past land use on forest herb recolonization is proposed, and used to analyse the colonization patterns of forest understorey herbaceous species in a 360-ha mixed forest, grassland and arable landscape in the Dijle river valley (central Belgium). 2 Fine-scale distribution maps were constructed for 14 species. The species were mapped in 15 946 forest plots and outside forests (along parcel margins) in 5188 plots. Forest stands varied in age between 1 and more than 224 years. Detailed land-use history data were combined with the species distribution maps to identify species-specific colonization sources and to calculate colonization distances. 3 The six most frequent species were selected for more detailed statistical analysis. 4 Logistic regression models indicated that species frequency in forest parcels was a function of secondary forest age, distance from the nearest colonization source and their interaction. Similar age and distance effects were found within hedgerows. 5 In 199 forest stands, data about soils, canopy structure and the cover of competitive species were collected. The relative importance of habitat quality and spatio-temporal isolation for the colonization of the forest herb species was quantified using structural equation modelling (SEM), within the framework proposed for the effects of past land use. 6 The results of the SEM indicate that, except for the better colonizing species, the measured habitat quality variables are of minor importance in explaining colonization patterns, compared with the combination of secondary forest age and distance from colonization sources. 7 Our results suggest the existence of a two-stage colonization process in which diaspore availability determines the initial pattern, which is affected by environmental sorting at later stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems
Grace, J. B. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617799 · Cited by 2,432
PAILLET, Y., BERGÈS, L., HJÄLTÉN, J., ÓDOR, P., AVON, C., BERNHARDT‐RÖMERMANN, M., BIJLSMA, R., DE BRUYN, L., FUHR, M., GRANDIN, U., et al. (2010) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x · Cited by 960
What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly
CRAMER, V, HOBBS, R., & STANDISH, R. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 · Cited by 890
Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes
Flinn, K. M., & Vellend, M. (2005) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0243:rofpci]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 477
Hermy, M., & Verheyen, K. (2007) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1007/s11284-007-0354-3 · Cited by 368
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Verheyen, K., Guntenspergen, G. R., Biesbrouck, B., & Hermy, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-19
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 731-742
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2131622473
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00807.x
- The paper
- Verheyen, K., Guntenspergen, G. R., Biesbrouck, B., & Hermy, M. (2003). An integrated analysis of the effects of past land use on forest herb colonization at the landscape scale. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00807.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.