The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legacies of the past in the present‐day forest biodiversity: a review of past land‐use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity
Abstract
Particularly in the temperate climate zone many forests have, at some moment in their history, been used as agriculture land. Forest cover is therefore often not as stable as it might look. How forest plant communities recovered after agriculture was abandoned allows us to explore some universal questions on how dispersal and environment limit plant species abundance and distribution. All studies looking at the effects of historical land use rely on adequate land use reconstruction. A variety of tools from maps, archival studies, and interviews to field evidence and soil analyses contribute to that. They allow us to distinguish ancient from recent forests and many studies found pronounced differences in forest plant species composition between them. A considerable percentage of our forest flora is associated with ancient forests. These ancient forest plant species (AFS) all have a low colonization capacity, suggesting that dispersal in space (distance related) and time (seed bank related) limit their distribution and abundance. However recent forests generally are suitable for the recruitment of AFS. There is clear evidence that dispersal limitation is more important than recruitment limitation in the distribution of AFS. Dispersal in time, through persistent seed banks, does not play a significant role. Ancient forests are not necessary more species‐rich than recent forest, but if diversity is limited to typical forest plant species then ancient forests do have the highest number of plant species, making them highly important for nature conservation. The use of molecular markers, integrated approaches and modelling are all part of the way forward in this field of historical ecology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408
Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen.
Pigott, C. D., & Ellenberg, H. (1984) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2260081 · Cited by 1,716
Long‐distance seed dispersal in plant populations
Cain, M. L., Milligan, B. G., & Strand, A. E. (2000) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.2307/2656714 · Cited by 1,176
The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity
Thompson, K. A., Bakker, J. P., & Bekker, R. M. (1996) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 1,165
Forest Resources of the United States, 2002
Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., Vissage, J. S., & Pugh, S. A. (2004) · doi:10.2737/nc-gtr-241 · Cited by 900
IRREVERSIBLE IMPACT OF PAST LAND USE ON FOREST SOILS AND BIODIVERSITY
Dupouey, J. L., Dambrine, E., Laffite, J. D., & Moares, C. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2978:iioplu]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 775
Hermy, M., Honnay, O., Firbank, L., Grashof-Bokdam, C., & Lawesson, J. E. (1999) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00045-2 · Cited by 685
Self-citationNature Management by Grazing and Cutting
Bakker, J. P. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2255-6 · Cited by 673
Foster, D. R., Motzkin, G., & Slater, B. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900008 · Cited by 662
Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA
Foster, D. R. (1992) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2260864 · Cited by 658
Cited by
What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly
CRAMER, V, HOBBS, R., & STANDISH, R. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 · Cited by 890
Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change
Kaplan, J. O., Krumhardt, K. M., Ellis, E. C., Ruddiman, W. F., Lemmen, C., & Goldewijk, K. K. (2011) · The Holocene · doi:10.1177/0959683610386983 · Cited by 659
Agnoletti, M. (2014) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.012 · Cited by 358
The functional role of temperate forest understorey vegetation in a changing world
Landuyt, D., De Lombaerde, E., Perring, M. P., Hertzog, L. R., Ampoorter, E., Maes, S. L., De Frenne, P., Ma, S., Proesmans, W., Blondeel, H., et al. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14756 · Cited by 326
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hermy, M., & Verheyen, K.
- Venue
- Ecological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-20
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-371
- ISSN
- 0912-3814 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1703
- OpenAlex
- W2106254796
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legacies of the past in the present‐day forest biodiversity: a review of past land‐use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11284-007-0354-3
- The paper
- Hermy, M., & Verheyen, K. (2007). Legacies of the past in the present‐day forest biodiversity: a review of past land‐use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. Ecological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-007-0354-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.