Cited by 45Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchSchizophrenia research and treatmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Use of the atypical antipsychotics Olanzapine and Risperidone in adults with intellectual disability

Williams, H., Clarke, R., Bouras, N., Martin, J., Holt, G.·2000·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

The present study was designed to monitor the use of atypical antipsychotics in adults with intellectual disability and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of these drugs. Twenty‐one patients were commenced on an atypical antipsychotic: 12 on Olanzapine and nine on Risperidone. The ICD‐10 diagnoses of the subjects were mild (13 cases) or moderate (8 cases) mental retardation, and psychiatric disorders (17 cases) with significant impairment of behaviour in 10 cases. Tolerability was good for 15 patients experiencing minimum or no side‐effects, and medication was only stopped as a result of side‐effects in one case. Clinical global outcome was rated as minimally improved or better for 16 cases. The present findings suggest that the atypical antipsychotics Olanzapine and Risperidone are well tolerated by patients with intellectual disability and psychiatric disorders, and are broadly effective against target symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00284.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, H., Clarke, R., Bouras, N., Martin, J., & Holt, G.
Affiliations
Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Holt, G.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
164-169
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W1558287329
Cited by
45
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
atypical antipsychotics, olanzapine, risperidone, intellectual disability, adults with intellectual disabilities, mental illness, behavioural impairment, tolerability, adverse drug reactions, clinical effectiveness, antipsychotic treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adult, Benzodiazepines, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Pirenzepine, Prospective Studies, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Risperidone, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review