Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extensive use of peripheral angioplasty, particularly infrapopliteal, in the treatment of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: clinical results of a multicentric study of 221 consecutive diabetic subjects

Open access
Faglia, E., Mantero, M., Caminiti, M., CaravaggI, C., De Giglio, R., Pritelli, C., Clerici, G., Fratino, P., De Cata, P., Paola, L. Dalla, Mariani, G., Poli, M., Settembrini, P. G., Sciangula, L., Morabito, A., Graziani, L.·2002·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Faglia E, Mantero M, Caminiti M, Caravaggi C, De Giglio R, Pritelli C, Clerici G, Fratino P, De Cata P, Paola LD, Mariani G, Poli M, Settembrini PG, Sciangula L, Morabito A, Graziani L (Internal Medicine Unit, Diabetology Centre, Policlinico Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano; Centre for the Study and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Pathology, Abbiategrasso Hospital, Milano; Internal Medicine Unit, IRCCS Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, Pavia; Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Diabetic Foot Centre, Villa Berica Hospital, Vicenza Italy; Diabetology Centre and Vascular Surgery Division, S. Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milano; Diabetology Centre, `Felice Villa' Hospital, Mariano Comense Como; Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, S. Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Cardiovascular Catheterization Laboratory, `Città di Brescia' Hospital, Brescia, Italy). Extensive use of peripheral angioplasty, particularly infrapopliteal, in the treatment of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: clinical results of a multicentric study of 221 consecutive diabetic subjects. J Intern Med 2002; 252: 225–232. Objectives. To evaluate the feasibility, technical effectiveness and limb salvage potential of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), particularly infrapopliteal, in diabetic subjects with ischaemic foot ulcer. Design. Intervention study with PTA in consecutive series. Setting. Six Diabetology Foot Centres and one Cardiovascular Catheterization Laboratory in Italy. Subjects. Two hundred and twenty‐one consecutive diabetic subjects hospitalized for ischaemic foot ulcer. Interventions. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) was investigated by means of foot pulses assessment, ankle‐brachial‐index (ABI), transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO 2) and duplex scanning. If non‐invasive parameters suggested PAOD, angiography was performed and a PTA was carried out during the same session. Main outcome measures. PTA feasibility, improvement of ABI and TcPO 2, limb salvage rate, clinical recurrence. Results. On angiography, two patients had stenoses which were <50% of the vessel diameter. PTA was performed in 191 (85.3%) of the 219 subjects with stenoses >50%, even when longer than 10 cm and/or multiple/calcified. In 11 patients (5.8%) PTA was performed in the proximal axis exclusively, in 81 (42.4%) patients in the infrapopliteal axis exclusively and in 99 (51.8%) in both the femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal axis. Both ABI and TcPO 2 improved significantly after PTA (P < 0.0001). Clinical recurrence occurred in 14 subjects: 10 of whom underwent a second successful PTA. Of the 191 patients who underwent PTA, 10 (5.2%) underwent an above‐the‐ankle amputation. Conclusions. PTA, including infrapopliteal, is feasible in most diabetic subjects with ischaemic foot ulcer and is effective for foot revascularization. Clinical recurrence was infrequent and the procedure could successfully be repeated in most cases. In subjects treated successfully with PTA the above‐the‐ankle amputation rate was low. PTA should be considered as the revascularization treatment of first choice in all diabetic subjects with foot ulcer and PAOD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01015.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Faglia, E., Mantero, M., Caminiti, M., CaravaggI, C., De Giglio, R., Pritelli, C., Clerici, G., Fratino, P., De Cata, P., Paola, L. D., Mariani, G., Poli, M., Settembrini, P. G., Sciangula, L., Morabito, A., & Graziani, L.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
252
Issue
3
Pages
225-232
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2139258065
Cited by
256
References
10
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extensive use of peripheral angioplasty, particularly infrapopliteal, in the treatment of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: clinical results of a multicentric study of 221 consecutive diabetic subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01015.x
The paper
Faglia, E., Mantero, M., Caminiti, M., CaravaggI, C., De Giglio, R., Pritelli, C., Clerici, G., Fratino, P., De Cata, P., Paola, L. D., Mariani, G., Poli, M., Settembrini, P. G., Sciangula, L., Morabito, A., & Graziani, L. (2002). Extensive use of peripheral angioplasty, particularly infrapopliteal, in the treatment of ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: clinical results of a multicentric study of 221 consecutive diabetic subjects. Journal of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01015.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.