Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New Ulceration, New Major Amputation, and Survival Rates in Diabetic Subjects Hospitalized for Foot Ulceration From 1990 to 1993

Open access
Faglia, Ezio, Favales, Fabrizio, Morabito, Alberto·2001·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE— To evaluate 1) the new ulceration, the new major amputation, and the survival rates of 115 diabetic subjects hospitalized for foot ulceration from 1990 to 1993, with an average follow-up of 6.5 years,and 2) the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with these events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— A total of 115 subjects, 31 women and 84 men, were monitored until 31 December 1998. All subjects were provided with therapeutic shoes and received intense education. Data concerning new ulceration, new major amputation, and reamputation events and the date and cause of death were recorded for each patient. The prognostic factors for these events were then evaluated. RESULTS— The average follow-up was 78.3 ± 15.3 months(range 60-106). During this time, 13 homolateral and 12 contralateral episodes of new ulceration occurred. At univariate analysis, none of the variables considered were significantly associated with the new ulceration. There were three major amputations: two of the limb previously healed and one of the contralateral limb. Of the 115 subjects, 51 (44.3%) died: 24 of the 31 women(77.4%) and 27 of the 84 men (32.1%). Ischemic cardiopathy was the most frequent cause of death (60.8%). Mortality concerned 20 of the 27 subjects(74.1%) undergoing major amputation from 1990 to 1993 and 31 of the 88 healed subjects (35.2%), with a significant difference (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed the independent role of the ankle-brachial index≤0.5 (P = 0.005), age (P = 0.003), and female sex(P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS— We believe that the use of therapeutic shoes and intense educational training, including the education of the family, have contributed to the low incidence of new ulceration and major amputation in our study population. The high frequency of ischemic cardiopathy as a cause of death should, perhaps, lead to a more aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic attitude toward this pathology in diabetic subjects admitted to hospitals for foot ulceration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.24.1.78

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Faglia, E., Favales, F., & Morabito, A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
78-83
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2141118938
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Ulceration, New Major Amputation, and Survival Rates in Diabetic Subjects Hospitalized for Foot Ulceration From 1990 to 1993. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.24.1.78
The paper
Faglia, E., Favales, F., & Morabito, A. (2001). New Ulceration, New Major Amputation, and Survival Rates in Diabetic Subjects Hospitalized for Foot Ulceration From 1990 to 1993. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.1.78

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.