Cited by 203Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersNeural dynamics and brain function

Fast track:Unilateral vibrissae stimulation during waking induces interhemispheric EEG asymmetry during subsequent sleep in the rat

Vyazovskiy, V., Borbély, A. A., Tobler, I.·2000·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

To test the theory that sleep is a regional, use‐dependent process, rats were subjected to unilateral sensory stimulation during waking. This was achieved by cutting the whiskers on one side, in order to reduce the sensory input to the contralateral cortex. The animals were kept awake for 6 h in an enriched environment to activate the cortex contralateral to the intact side. Whiskers are known to be represented in the barrel field of the contralateral somatosensory cortex and their stimulation during exploratory behavior results in a specific activation of the projection area. In the 6 h recovery period following sleep deprivation, spectral power of the nonrapid eye‐movement (NREM) sleep EEG in the 0.75–6.0 Hz range exhibited an interhemispheric shift towards the cortex that was contralateral to the intact whiskers. The results support the theory that sleep has a regional, use‐dependent facet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2000.00230.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In animals, the encoding and learning of information during waking produced consistent increases in SWA in respective cortical networks during subsequent SWS.

    “In animals, the encoding and learning of information during waking produced consistent increases in SWA in respective cortical networks during subsequent SWS (624, 1263).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1263]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 203

Authors
Vyazovskiy, V., Borbély, A. A., & Tobler, I.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Tobler, I.
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12-18
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
367-371
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2052910153
Cited by
203
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
whisker stimulation, whiskers, sleep deprivation, NREM sleep, somatosensory cortex, barrel cortex, environmental enrichment, cortical activation, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Brain, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Sleep, REM, Wakefulness, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review