Cited by 89Gut microbiota and healthComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The digestive tract and life history of small mammals

LANGER, PETER·2002·Mammal Review

Abstract

The type of food, differentiation of the large intestine and stomach, and methane production, as well as life history data, are considered in Insectivora, Rodentia and Lagomorpha. When food containing plant cell wall material is eaten, there is either a differentiation of the stomach or the large intestine. In animals with low body mass and little differentiation of the gastrointestinal tract, methane production is low, but structures essential for microbial digestion of plant cell wall material, such as haustration of the colon or formation of a caecum, can be found in many methane‐producers. Animals with a body mass < 500 g and a weaning time < 20 days are non‐producers of methane. Establishment of a balanced microbial population in the gastrointestinal tract requires some time. Many non‐producers of methane wean their young in < 10 days, but many producers need > 50 days for the weaning process. Caviomorpha, Thryonomyidae and Hystricidae seem to have ‘opened the door’ to the use of low quality food by microbial fermentation, but some of them have to ‘pay’ for this extension of the food range by an extended weaning period, which also means an extended dependency on the mother.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2002.00101.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sacculus rotundus, the last segment of the rabbit ileum that is markedly extended in the rabbit, is absent in chinchilla.

    “Also, the sacculus rotundus, the last segment of the rabbit ileum that is markedly extended in the rabbit (Barrone 1997; Stan et al., 2013) is absent in chinchilla (Langer 2002).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Langer 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LANGER, P.
Affiliations
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
LANGER, PETER
Venue
Mammal Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
107-131
ISSN
  • 0305-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2907
OpenAlex
W2125750815
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mammal Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
life history, methane production, plant cell wall digestion, microbial fermentation, cecum, weaning period, Caviomorpha, Thryonomyidae, porcupines, Insectivora, rodents, lagomorphs, body mass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review