The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patients as teachers: a qualitative study of patients’ views on their role in a community‐based undergraduate project
Abstract
Objectives: Patients have been used in clinical medical education for many years with, traditionally, a relatively passive role. Following the General Medical Council recommendations for curricular change and the development of more community‐based teaching, ‘ordinary patients’ in the community are increasingly being partnered with undergraduate students for particular projects. Very little research has been undertaken on patients’ perceptions of this role. Design: Semi‐structured interviews were carried out with 20 people to explore the views of patients taking part in a community‐based undergraduate medical student project (the ‘patient study’) at Newcastle Medical School about their role as teachers of medical students, what they felt they had gained from participating, any problems or concerns and suggestions for change or improvement. Setting: Newcastle Medical School, UK. Subjects: Second‐year medical students. Results: Two major themes emerged. First, patients saw themselves in active roles as teachers: as experts in their medical condition; as exemplars of their condition; and as facilitators of the development of students’ professional skills and attitudes. Secondly, patients felt they had benefited from participation, through talking about their problems; learning more about themselves; the satisfaction of helping; and from receiving gifts. In addition, a number of other issues were identified including interpersonal dynamics, gender and ethnic differences, inadequate briefing of participants and whether such community‐based patient involvement might, in some situations, be felt to be exploitative. Conclusions: The study has shown that patients see themselves clearly as having specific contributions to make to medical students’ education and training. This has implications for the further development of community‐based teaching.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Cited by
Changing face of medical curricula
Jones, R., Higgs, R., de Angelis, C., & Prideaux, D. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04134-9 · Cited by 324
Patient‐oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students
Spencer, J., Blackmore, D., Heard, S., McCrorie, P., McHaffie, D., Scherpbier, A., Gupta, T. S., Singh, K., & Southgate, L. (2000) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00779.x · Cited by 294
Self-citationDeveloping the role of patients as teachers: literature review
Wykurz, G., & Kelly, D. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7368.818 · Cited by 289
Jha, V., Quinton, N. D., Bekker, H. L., & Roberts, T. E. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03244.x · Cited by 242
Bokken, L., Rethans, J.-J., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2008) · Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e318182fc56 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Stacy, R., & Spencer, J.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 688-694
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2111446857
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patients as teachers: a qualitative study of patients’ views on their role in a community‐based undergraduate project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00454.x
- The paper
- Stacy, R., & Spencer, J. (1999). Patients as teachers: a qualitative study of patients’ views on their role in a community‐based undergraduate project. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00454.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.