Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship

Haidet, Paul, Dains, Joyce E, Paterniti, Debora A, Hechtel, Laura, Chang, Tai, Tseng, Ellen, Rogers, John C·2002·Medical Education

Abstract

Context Medical educators have emphasized the importance of teaching patient‐centred care. Objectives To describe and quantify the attitudes of medical students towards patient‐centred care and to examine: (a) the differences in these attitudes between students in early and later years of medical school; and (b) factors associated with patient‐centred attitudes. Methods We surveyed 673 students in the first, third, and fourth years of medical school. Our survey utilized the Patient–Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), a validated instrument designed to measure individual preferences towards various aspects of the doctor–patient relationship. Total PPOS scores can range from patient‐centred (egalitarian, whole person oriented) to disease‐ or doctor‐centred (paternalistic, less attuned to psychosocial issues). Additional demographic data including gender, age, ethnicity, undergraduate coursework, family medical background and specialty choice were collected from the fourth year class. Results A total of 510 students (76%) completed data collection. Female gender ( P < 0·001) and earlier year of medical school ( P = 0·03) were significantly associated with patient‐centred attitudes. Among fourth year students ( n = 89), characteristics associated with more patient‐centred attitudes included female gender, European‐American ethnicity, and primary‐care career choice ( P < 0·05 for each comparison). Conclusion Despite emphasis on the need for curricula that foster patient‐centred attitudes among medical students, our data suggest that students in later years of medical school have attitudes that are more doctor‐centred or paternalistic compared to students in earlier years. Given the emphasis placed on patient satisfaction and patient‐centred care in the current medical environment, our results warrant further research and dialogue to explore the dynamics in medical education that may foster or inhibit student attitudes toward patient‐centred care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Haidet, P., Dains, J. E., Paterniti, D. A., Hechtel, L., Chang, T., Tseng, E., & Rogers, J. C.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05-31
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
568-574
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2142721730
Cited by
311
References
0
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x
The paper
Haidet, P., Dains, J. E., Paterniti, D. A., Hechtel, L., Chang, T., Tseng, E., & Rogers, J. C. (2002). Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.