The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship
Abstract
Context Medical educators have emphasized the importance of teaching patient‐centred care. Objectives To describe and quantify the attitudes of medical students towards patient‐centred care and to examine: (a) the differences in these attitudes between students in early and later years of medical school; and (b) factors associated with patient‐centred attitudes. Methods We surveyed 673 students in the first, third, and fourth years of medical school. Our survey utilized the Patient–Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), a validated instrument designed to measure individual preferences towards various aspects of the doctor–patient relationship. Total PPOS scores can range from patient‐centred (egalitarian, whole person oriented) to disease‐ or doctor‐centred (paternalistic, less attuned to psychosocial issues). Additional demographic data including gender, age, ethnicity, undergraduate coursework, family medical background and specialty choice were collected from the fourth year class. Results A total of 510 students (76%) completed data collection. Female gender ( P < 0·001) and earlier year of medical school ( P = 0·03) were significantly associated with patient‐centred attitudes. Among fourth year students ( n = 89), characteristics associated with more patient‐centred attitudes included female gender, European‐American ethnicity, and primary‐care career choice ( P < 0·05 for each comparison). Conclusion Despite emphasis on the need for curricula that foster patient‐centred attitudes among medical students, our data suggest that students in later years of medical school have attitudes that are more doctor‐centred or paternalistic compared to students in earlier years. Given the emphasis placed on patient satisfaction and patient‐centred care in the current medical environment, our results warrant further research and dialogue to explore the dynamics in medical education that may foster or inhibit student attitudes toward patient‐centred care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: An Innovative Model of Clinical Education
Ogur, B., Hirsh, D., Krupat, E., & Bor, D. (2007) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31803338f0 · Cited by 288
Medical students' learning from patient-led teaching: experiential versus biomedical knowledge
Henriksen, A.-H., & Ringsted, C. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9454-8 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidet, P., Dains, J. E., Paterniti, D. A., Hechtel, L., Chang, T., Tseng, E., & Rogers, J. C.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-31
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 568-574
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2142721730
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x
- The paper
- Haidet, P., Dains, J. E., Paterniti, D. A., Hechtel, L., Chang, T., Tseng, E., & Rogers, J. C. (2002). Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.