The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: An Innovative Model of Clinical Education
Abstract
The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship (HMS-CIC) is a redesign of the principal clinical year to foster students' learning from close and continuous contact with cohorts of patients in the disciplines of internal medicine, neurology, obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. With year-long mentoring, students follow their patients through major venues of care. Surgery and radiology also are taught longitudinally, grounded in the clinical experiences of a cohort of patients and in a brief immersion experience working directly with an attending surgeon. Students participate in weekly, case-based tutorials integrating instruction in the basic sciences with training to address the common and important issues in medicine, as identified by national organizations. In addition, they participate in a social science curriculum that focuses on self-reflection, communication skills, ethics, population sciences, and cultural competence. In the pilot year (July 2004 to July 2005), HMS-CIC students performed at least as well as traditional students in tests of content knowledge and skills, as measured by National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Exams and the fourth-year Objective Structured Clinical Exam, and they scored higher on a year-end comprehensive clinical skills self-assessment examination, suggesting that they retained content knowledge better. From surveys, HMS-CIC students were much more likely to see patients before diagnosis and after discharge and to receive feedback and mentoring from experienced faculty than were their traditionally educated peers. HMS-CIC students expressed more satisfaction with their curriculum and felt better prepared to cope with the professional challenges of patient care, such as being truly caring, involving patients in decision making, and understanding how the social context affects their patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schmidt, H. G., Norman, G. R., & Boshuizen, H. P. (1990) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199010000-00001 · Cited by 1,109
“Continuity” as an Organizing Principle for Clinical Education Reform
Hirsh, D. A., Ogur, B., Thibault, G. E., & Cox, M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb061660 · Cited by 540
Self-citationThe Medical School Objectives Writing Group (1999) · Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · doi:10.1097/00001888-199901000-00010 · Cited by 449
Haidet, P., & Stein, H. F. (2006) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x · Cited by 352
Vanquishing Virtue: The Impact of Medical Education
Coulehan, J., & Williams, P. C. (2001) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200106000-00008 · Cited by 329
Medical student attitudes toward the doctor–patient relationship
Haidet, P., Dains, J. E., Paterniti, D. A., Hechtel, L., Chang, T., Tseng, E., & Rogers, J. C. (2002) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01233.x · Cited by 311
Patient‐oriented learning: a review of the role of the patient in the education of medical students
Spencer, J., Blackmore, D., Heard, S., McCrorie, P., McHaffie, D., Scherpbier, A., Gupta, T. S., Singh, K., & Southgate, L. (2000) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00779.x · Cited by 294
Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking
Bordage, G. (1994) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199411000-00004 · Cited by 286
Worley, P., Silagy, C., Prideaux, D., Newble, D., & Jones, A. (2000) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00668.x · Cited by 219
Task‐based learning: the answer to integration and problem‐based learning in the clinical years
Harden, Crosby, Davis, Howie, & Struthers (2000) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00698.x · Cited by 186
Cited by
The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96
Brauer, D. G., & Ferguson, K. J. (2015) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.970998 · Cited by 571
“Continuity” as an Organizing Principle for Clinical Education Reform
Hirsh, D. A., Ogur, B., Thibault, G. E., & Cox, M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb061660 · Cited by 540
Self-citationNorris, T. E., Schaad, D. C., DeWitt, D., Ogur, B., & Hunt, D. D. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a85776 · Cited by 282
Self-citationStudent perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships
Bates, J., Konkin, J., Suddards, C., Dobson, S., & Pratt, D. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12087 · Cited by 145
Banerjee, S., Farina, N., Daley, S., Grosvenor, W., Hughes, L., Hebditch, M., Mackrell, S., Nilforooshan, R., Wyatt, C., de Vries, K., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4602 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Ogur, B., Hirsh, D., Krupat, E., & Bor, D.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 397-404
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147481282
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: An Innovative Model of Clinical Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/acm.0b013e31803338f0
- The paper
- Ogur, B., Hirsh, D., Krupat, E., & Bor, D. (2007). The Harvard Medical School-Cambridge Integrated Clerkship: An Innovative Model of Clinical Education. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31803338f0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.