Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective

Lievens, Filip, Coetsier, Pol, De Fruyt, Filip, De Maeseneer, Jan·2002·Medical Education

Abstract

Objectives This study investigates: (1) which personality traits are typical of medical students as compared to other students, and (2) which personality traits predict medical student performance in pre‐clinical years. Design This paper reports a cross‐sectional inventory study of students in nine academic majors and a prospective longitudinal study of one cohort of medical students assessed by inventory during their first preclinical year and by university examination at the end of each pre‐clinical year. Subjects and methods In 1997, a combined total of 785 students entered medical studies courses in five Flemish universities. Of these, 631 (80·4%) completed the NEO‐PI‐R (i.e. a measure of the Five‐Factor Model of Personality). This was also completed by 914 Year 1 students of seven other academic majors at Ghent University. Year end scores for medical students were obtained for 607 students in Year 1, for 413 in Year 2, and for 341 in Year 3. Results Medical studies falls into the group of majors where students score highest on extraversion and agreeableness . Conscientiousness (i.e. self‐achievement and self‐discipline) significantly predicts final scores in each pre‐clinical year. Medical students who score low on conscientiousness and high on gregariousness and excitement‐seeking are significantly less likely to sit examinations successfully. Conclusions The higher scores for extraversion and agreeableness , two dimensions defining the interpersonal dynamic, may be beneficial for doctors' collaboration and communication skills in future professional practice. Because conscientiousness affects examination results and can be reliably assessed at the start of a medical study career, personality assessment may be a useful tool in student counselling and guidance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-28
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1050-1056
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2122651616
Cited by
401
References
15
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
The paper
Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.