The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective
Abstract
Objectives This study investigates: (1) which personality traits are typical of medical students as compared to other students, and (2) which personality traits predict medical student performance in pre‐clinical years. Design This paper reports a cross‐sectional inventory study of students in nine academic majors and a prospective longitudinal study of one cohort of medical students assessed by inventory during their first preclinical year and by university examination at the end of each pre‐clinical year. Subjects and methods In 1997, a combined total of 785 students entered medical studies courses in five Flemish universities. Of these, 631 (80·4%) completed the NEO‐PI‐R (i.e. a measure of the Five‐Factor Model of Personality). This was also completed by 914 Year 1 students of seven other academic majors at Ghent University. Year end scores for medical students were obtained for 607 students in Year 1, for 413 in Year 2, and for 341 in Year 3. Results Medical studies falls into the group of majors where students score highest on extraversion and agreeableness . Conscientiousness (i.e. self‐achievement and self‐discipline) significantly predicts final scores in each pre‐clinical year. Medical students who score low on conscientiousness and high on gregariousness and excitement‐seeking are significantly less likely to sit examinations successfully. Conclusions The higher scores for extraversion and agreeableness , two dimensions defining the interpersonal dynamic, may be beneficial for doctors' collaboration and communication skills in future professional practice. Because conscientiousness affects examination results and can be reliably assessed at the start of a medical study career, personality assessment may be a useful tool in student counselling and guidance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.1.26 · Cited by 4,816
Personnel Selection: Test and Measurement Techniques
Smith, P. C., & Thorndike, R. L. (1951) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2518516 · Cited by 308
Personality and interests as predictors of educational streaming and achievement
de Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1996) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199612)10:5<405::aid-per255>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 228
Self-citationPersonnel Selection: Test and Measurement Techniques.
Cronbach, L. J. (1949) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0051818 · Cited by 187
Ferguson, E., Sanders, A., O'Hehir, F., & James, D. K. (2000) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317900167056 · Cited by 103
Studentsʼ psychosocial characteristics as predictors of academic performance in medical school
Hojat, M., Robeson, M., Damjanov, I., Veloski, J. J., Glaser, K., & Gonnella, J. S. (1993) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199308000-00015 · Cited by 102
Personality development in adulthood: The broad picture and processes in one longitudinal sample
Helson, R., & Kwan, S. (2000) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315812175 · Cited by 83
Shen, H., & Comrey, A. L. (1997) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199709000-00013 · Cited by 75
Psychological treatment of emotional problems by general practitioners
Cape, J. D. (1996) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1996.tb01854.x · Cited by 42
Cited by
Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009 · Cited by 2,909
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
Poropat, A. E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014996 · Cited by 2,729
Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance
Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x · Cited by 780
A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire
Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002 · Cited by 494
Personality and psychopathology of university students
Tosevski, D. L., Milovancevic, M. P., & Gajic, S. D. (2010) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e328333d625 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1050-1056
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2122651616
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
- The paper
- Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five‐factor model perspective. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01328.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.