Personality and psychopathology of university students
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: University students represent the national capital and investment for the future, with an implicit mission both for their families and for society as a whole. However, they face multiple stressors such as academic overload, constant pressure to succeed, competition with peers and in some countries financial burden and concerns about the future. As all this may lead to psychopathology, the health of university students has been the subject of increasing focus in recent years. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple protective and risk factors are involved in the psychological well being and distress of university students. Specific risk factors for the development of psychopathology are high test anxiety, lower self-efficacy, as well as certain personality traits. Moreover, some students arrive at college with already existing mental health problems. The most frequent mental disorders among students are substance abuse, depression, self-harm and suicide, eating and anxiety disorders. SUMMARY: Acquiring and improving knowledge about the student population is a crucial factor in the development of mental health promotion programs in order to meet their needs and to help them cope with various problems. Better understanding and care of the personality profile of university students can be helpful in academic and career choice and prevention of future mental health problems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first year of university is a life transition that may be a crucial period for students' mental health.
“The first year of university represents a life transition that might constitute a crucial period for students’ mental health (Cooke et al., 2006; Tosevski et al., 2010).”
From Feasibility of a Brief Online Mindfulness and Compassion-Based Intervention to Promote Mental Health Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as Tosevski et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 261
- Authors
- Tosevski, D. L., Milovancevic, M. P., & Gajic, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-52
- ISSN
- 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975197670
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- university students, psychopathology, personality traits, psychological well-being, psychological distress, risk factors, protective factors, test anxiety, self-efficacy, substance abuse, depression, self-harm, suicide, eating disorders, anxiety disorders, mental health promotion, academic stress
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Life Style, Personality, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Students, Universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review