The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications
Abstract
Background Surgical skills are required by a wide range of health care professionals. Tasks range from simple wound closure to highly complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Technical expertise, although essential, is only one component of a complex picture. By emphasising the importance of knowledge and attitudes, this article aims to locate the acquisition of surgical skills within a wider educational framework. Simulators Simulators can provide safe, realistic learning environments for repeated practice, underpinned by feedback and objective metrics of performance. Using a simple classification of simulators into model‐based, computer‐based or hybrid, this paper summarises the current state of the art and describes recent technological developments. Advances in computing have led to the establishment of precision placement and simple manipulation simulators within health care education, while complex manipulation and integrated procedure simulators are still in the development phase. Evaluation Tension often exists between the design and evaluation of surgical simulations. A lack of high quality published data is compounded by the difficulties of conducting longitudinal studies in such a fast‐moving field. The implications of this tension are discussed. The wider context The emphasis is now shifting from the technology of simulation towards partnership with education and clinical practice. This highlights the need for an integrated learning framework, where knowledge can be acquired alongside technical skills and not in isolation from them. Recent work on situated learning underlines the potential for simulation to feed into and enrich everyday clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis
Arthur Jr., W., Bennett Jr., W., Stanush, P. L., & McNelly, T. L. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1101_3 · Cited by 664
Cited by
Ericsson, K. A. (2004) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 · Cited by 2,988
Liaw, S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015 · Cited by 571
Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial
Larsen, C. R., Soerensen, J. L., Grantcharov, T. P., Dalsgaard, T., Schouenborg, L., Ottosen, C., Schroeder, T. V., & Ottesen, B. S. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b1802 · Cited by 555
Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis
Shin, S., Park, J.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2015) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009 · Cited by 543
Virtual and augmented reality applications in medicine: analysis of the scientific literature
Yeung, A. W. K., Tosevska, A., Klager, E., Eibensteiner, F., Laxar, D., Stoyanov, J., Glisic, M., Zeiner, S., Kulnik, S. T., Crutzen, R., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25499 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Kneebone, R.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-24
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-277
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W1982260952
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01440.x
- The paper
- Kneebone, R. (2003). Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01440.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.