The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of virtual reality training on an actual laparoscopic operation. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled and blinded trial. SETTING: Seven gynaecological departments in the Zeeland region of Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: 24 first and second year registrars specialising in gynaecology and obstetrics. INTERVENTIONS: Proficiency based virtual reality simulator training in laparoscopic salpingectomy and standard clinical education (controls). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was technical performance assessed by two independent observers blinded to trainee and training status using a previously validated general and task specific rating scale. The secondary outcome measure was operation time in minutes. RESULTS: The simulator trained group (n=11) reached a median total score of 33 points (interquartile range 32-36 points), equivalent to the experience gained after 20-50 laparoscopic procedures, whereas the control group (n=10) reached a median total score of 23 (22-27) points, equivalent to the experience gained from fewer than five procedures (P<0.001). The median total operation time in the simulator trained group was 12 minutes (interquartile range 10-14 minutes) and in the control group was 24 (20-29) minutes (P<0.001). The observers' inter-rater agreement was 0.79. CONCLUSION: Skills in laparoscopic surgery can be increased in a clinically relevant manner using proficiency based virtual reality simulator training. The performance level of novices was increased to that of intermediately experienced laparoscopists and operation time was halved. Simulator training should be considered before trainees carry out laparoscopic procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00311792.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966 · cited 1×
“Although virtual reality simulation has the potential to offer important advantages in the area of training for new skills and procedures, evidence on the transfer of skills from the simulated environment to the operating theatre is still limited.”
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Campbell, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694 · Cited by 3,474
Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’Brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., & Satava, R. M. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008 · Cited by 2,853
A Prospective Analysis of 1518 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: The Southern Surgeons Club
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199104183241601 · Cited by 1,433
Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training
Grantcharov, T. P., Kristiansen, V. B., Bendix, J., Bardram, L., Rosenberg, J., & Funch-Jensen, P. (2004) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4407 · Cited by 1,234
Self-citationThe financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room
Bridges, M., & Diamond, D. L. (1999) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00289-x · Cited by 798
Ahlberg, G., Enochsson, L., Gallagher, A. G., Hedman, L., Hogman, C., McClusky, D. A., Ramel, S., Smith, C. D., & Arvidsson, D. (2007) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050 · Cited by 693
Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery
Moorthy, K., Munz, Y., Sarker, S. K., & Darzi, A. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1032 · Cited by 651
Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications
Kneebone, R. (2003) · Medical Education · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01440.x · Cited by 619
Surgical Simulation: A Systematic Review
Sutherland, L. M., Middleton, P. F., Anthony, A., Hamdorf, J., Cregan, P., Scott, D., & Maddern, G. J. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000200839.93965.26 · Cited by 536
Cited by
Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation
Laver, K. E., Lange, B., George, S., Deutsch, J. E., Saposnik, G., & Crotty, M. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008349.pub4 · Cited by 800
Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery
Nagendran, M., Gurusamy, K. S., Aggarwal, R., Loizidou, M., & Davidson, B. R. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006575.pub3 · Cited by 593
Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training
Dawe, S. R., Pena, G. N., Windsor, J. A., Broeders, J. A. J. L., Cregan, P. C., Hewett, P. J., & Maddern, G. J. (2014) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9482 · Cited by 485
Adaptive virtual reality-based training: a systematic literature review and framework
Zahabi, M., & Abdul Razak, A. M. (2020) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00434-w · Cited by 233
Cleland, J., Walker, K. G., Gale, M., & Nicol, L. G. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13064 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen, C. R., Soerensen, J. L., Grantcharov, T. P., Dalsgaard, T., Schouenborg, L., Ottosen, C., Schroeder, T. V., & Ottesen, B. S.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-05-14
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- may14 2
- Pages
- b1802-b1802
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2025018107
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 41.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.b1802
- The paper
- Larsen, C. R., Soerensen, J. L., Grantcharov, T. P., Dalsgaard, T., Schouenborg, L., Ottosen, C., Schroeder, T. V., & Ottesen, B. S. (2009). Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.