The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review
Open accessAbstract
There is growing interest in the possibility that genetic compatibility may drive mate choice, including gamete choice, particularly from the perspective of understanding why females frequently mate with more than one male. Mate choice for compatibility differs from other forms of choice for genetic benefits (such as ‘good genes’) because individuals are expected to differ in their mate preferences, changing the evolutionary dynamics of sexual selection. Recent experiments designed to investigate genetic benefits of polyandry suggest that mate choice on the basis of genetic compatibility may be widespread. However, in most systems the mechanisms responsible for variation in compatibility are unknown. We review potential sources of variation in genetic compatibility and whether there is any evidence for mate choice driven by these factors. Selfish genetic elements appear to have the potential to drive mate compatibility mate choice, though as yet there is only one convincing example. There is abundant evidence for assortative mating between populations in hybrid zones, but very few examples where this is clearly a result of selection against mating with genetically less compatible individuals. There are also numerous cases of inbreeding avoidance, but little evidence that mate choice or differential fertilization success driven by genetic compatibility occurs between unrelated individuals. The exceptions to this are a handful of situations where both the alleles causing incompatibility and the alleles involved in mate choice are located in a chromosome region where recombination is suppressed. As yet there are only a few potential sources of genetic compatibility which have clearly been shown to drive mate choice. This may reflect limitations in the potential for the evolution of mate choice for genetic compatibility within populations, although the most promising sources of such incompatibilities have received relatively little research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war
Moore, T. (1991) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-n · Cited by 1,281
Wedekind, C., & Füri, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 · Cited by 494 · cited 3×
“1995; Wedekind & Füri 1997; Ober 1999; Ober et al .”
DNA Ligase and Exonuclease Activities in Virions of Rous Sarcoma Virus
MIZUTANI, S., TEMIN, H. M., KODAMA, M., & WELLS, R. T. (1971) · Nature New Biology · doi:10.1038/newbio230232a0 · Cited by 77
Cited by
Sexual selection and mate choice
Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015 · Cited by 1,258
PERSPECTIVE: MODELS OF SPECIATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 40 YEARS?
Gavrilets, S. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00233.x · Cited by 587
The Scent of Genetic Compatibility: Sexual Selection and the Major Histocompatibility Complex
Penn, D. J. (2002) · Ethology · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00768.x · Cited by 503
Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory
Kempenaers, B. (2007) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(07)37005-8 · Cited by 322
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Haemonchus contortus
Gilleard, J. S., & Redman, E. (2016) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/bs.apar.2016.02.009 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Tregenza, T., & Wedell, N.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1013-1027
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2120809140
- Cited by
- 958
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x
- The paper
- Tregenza, T., & Wedell, N. (2000). Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.