The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis
Abstract
Homoplasy has recently attracted the attention of population geneticists, as a consequence of the popularity of highly variable stepwise mutating markers such as microsatellites. Microsatellite alleles generally refer to DNA fragments of different size (electromorphs). Electromorphs are identical in state (i.e. have identical size), but are not necessarily identical by descent due to convergent mutation(s). Homoplasy occurring at microsatellites is thus referred to as size homoplasy. Using new analytical developments and computer simulations, we first evaluate the effect of the mutation rate, the mutation model, the effective population size and the time of divergence between populations on size homoplasy at the within and between population levels. We then review the few experimental studies that used various molecular techniques to detect size homoplasious events at some microsatellite loci. The relationship between this molecularly accessible size homoplasy size and the actual amount of size homoplasy is not trivial, the former being considerably influenced by the molecular structure of microsatellite core sequences. In a third section, we show that homoplasy at microsatellite electromorphs does not represent a significant problem for many types of population genetics analyses realized by molecular ecologists, the large amount of variability at microsatellite loci often compensating for their homoplasious evolution. The situations where size homoplasy may be more problematic involve high mutation rates and large population sizes together with strong allele size constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what?
ESTOUP, A., & GUILLEMAUD, T. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04773.x · Cited by 649
Self-citationGenome-wide profiling of heritable and de novo STR variations
Willems, T., Zielinski, D., Yuan, J., Gordon, A., Gymrek, M., & Erlich, Y. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4267 · Cited by 329
Ségurel, L., Martínez-Cruz, B., Quintana-Murci, L., Balaresque, P., Georges, M., Hegay, T., Aldashev, A., Nasyrova, F., Jobling, M. A., Heyer, E., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200 · Cited by 95
Palstra, F. P., Heyer, E., & Austerlitz, F. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv030 · Cited by 36
Ganguly, I., Jeevan, C., Singh, S., Dixit, S. P., Sodhi, M., Ranjan, A., Kumar, S., & Sharma, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66133-3 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Estoup, A., Jarne, P., & Cornuet, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1591-1604
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2159056064
- Cited by
- 905
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01576.x
- The paper
- Estoup, A., Jarne, P., & Cornuet, J. (2002). Homoplasy and mutation model at microsatellite loci and their consequences for population genetics analysis. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01576.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.