The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co‐existing grass species have distinctive arbuscular mycorrhizal communities
Open accessAbstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are biotrophic symbionts colonizing the majority of land plants, and are of major importance in plant nutrient supply. Their diversity is suggested to be an important determinant of plant community structure, but the influence of host‐plant and environmental factors on AM fungal community in plant roots is poorly documented. Using the terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T‐RFLP) strategy, the diversity of AM fungi was assessed in 89 roots of three grass species (Agrostis capillaris,Festuca rubra,Poa pratensis) that co‐occurred in the same plots of a field experiment. The impact of different soil amendments (nitrogen, lime, nitrogen and lime) and insecticide application on AM fungal community was also studied. The level of diversity found in AM fungal communities using the T‐RFLP strategy was consistent with previous studies based on clone libraries. Our results clearly confirm that an AM fungal host‐plant preference exists, even between different grass species. AM communities colonizing A. capillaris were statistically different from the others (P < 0.05). Although grass species evenness changed in amended soils, AM fungal community composition in roots of a given grass species remained stable. Conversely, in plots where insecticide was applied, we found higher AM fungal diversity and, in F. rubra roots, a statistically different AM fungal community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Cited by
Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms
Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W., & Rillig, M. C. (2007) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5 · Cited by 1,269
Plant coexistence and the niche
SILVERTOWN, J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.003 · Cited by 1,248
Lee, J., Lee, S., & Young, J. P. W. (2008) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00531.x · Cited by 871
Self-citationInvasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
A trait-based framework to understand life history of mycorrhizal fungi
Chagnon, P.-L., Bradley, R. L., Maherali, H., & Klironomos, J. N. (2013) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.05.001 · Cited by 718
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Ridgway, K. P., Watson, I. J., Fitter, A. H., & Young, J. P. W.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3085-3095
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2109566965
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co‐existing grass species have distinctive arbuscular mycorrhizal communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01967.x
- The paper
- Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Ridgway, K. P., Watson, I. J., Fitter, A. H., & Young, J. P. W. (2003). Co‐existing grass species have distinctive arbuscular mycorrhizal communities. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01967.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.