The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real‐time estimation of migration rate: a simulation‐based exploration of accuracy and power
Abstract
Genetic assignment methods use genotype likelihoods to draw inference about where individuals were or were not born, potentially allowing direct, real‐time estimates of dispersal. We used simulated data sets to test the power and accuracy of Monte Carlo resampling methods in generating statistical thresholds for identifying F0 immigrants in populations with ongoing gene flow, and hence for providing direct, real‐time estimates of migration rates. The identification of accurate critical values required that resampling methods preserved the linkage disequilibrium deriving from recent generations of immigrants and reflected the sampling variance present in the data set being analysed. A novel Monte Carlo resampling method taking into account these aspects was proposed and its efficiency was evaluated. Power and error were relatively insensitive to the frequency assumed for missing alleles. Power to identify F0 immigrants was improved by using large sample size (up to about 50 individuals) and by sampling all populations from which migrants may have originated. A combination of plotting genotype likelihoods and calculating mean genotype likelihood ratios (D LR) appeared to be an effective way to predict whether F0 immigrants could be identified for a particular pair of populations using a given set of markers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
SAMPLING VARIANCES OF HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE
Nei, M., & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/76.2.379 · Cited by 1,641
Cited by
Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations
Sork, V. L., & Smouse, P. E. (2006) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5415-9 · Cited by 352
UNDERWOOD, J. N., SMITH, L. D., VAN OPPEN, M. J. H., & GILMOUR, J. P. (2007) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03187.x · Cited by 231
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Ecologically relevant dispersal of corals on isolated reefs: implications for managing resilience
Underwood, J. N., Smith, L. D., Oppen, M. J. H. V., & Gilmour, J. P. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1461.1 · Cited by 157
Genetic Traces of Recent Long-Distance Dispersal in a Predominantly Self-Recruiting Coral
van Oppen, M. J. H., Lutz, A., De'ath, G., Peplow, L., & Kininmonth, S. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003401 · Cited by 97
“This likelihood was compared with the likelihood distribution of 10,000 simulated genotypes from each sampling location [54].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Paetkau, D., Slade, R., Burden, M., & Estoup, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-65
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2152021152
- Cited by
- 1,547
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real‐time estimation of migration rate: a simulation‐based exploration of accuracy and power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02008.x
- The paper
- Paetkau, D., Slade, R., Burden, M., & Estoup, A. (2004). Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real‐time estimation of migration rate: a simulation‐based exploration of accuracy and power. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02008.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.