Cited by 101Listeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Specific binding of the Listeria monocytogenes transcriptional regulator PrfA to target sequences requires additional factor(s) and is influenced by iron

Abstract

The PrfA protein, which is a member of the Crp/Fnr family of prokaryotic transcription activators, regulates the virulence genes of Listeria monocytogenes. In this work, specific binding of PrfA to its target DNA was determined by electrophoretic mobility‐shift assays (EMSAs) using cell‐free extracts from the two L. monocytogenes strains EGD and NCTC 7973. PrfA‐specific binding differs between the two strains, even when the concentration of PrfA was adjusted to similar levels. Both strains exhibited increased PrfA‐specific binding after a shift into minimal essential medium (MEM) without showing a significant change in the amount of PrfA protein, relative to extracts from bacteria grown in brain–heart infusion (BHI). The purified PrfA protein from strain EGD produced in Escherichia coli did not exhibit specific binding to the target DNA but did so upon addition of PrfA‐free extracts from various Listeria species and Bacillus subtilis. The observed activation of PrfA seems to be caused by a PrfA‐activating factor (Paf), which is probably a protein since elevated temperature, but not RNase treatment, destroyed the activation potential of such PrfA‐free extracts. Moreover, fractionation of these extracts by sucrose gradient centrifugation yielded the Paf activity in a fraction sedimenting at 3.2 S. Specific binding of PrfA‐containing extracts from strain EGD to the hly and actA promoter sequences was strongly inhibited by iron, whereas that of extracts from strain NCTC 7973 was only slightly reduced. The iron effect seems to be mediated by Paf rather than by PrfA itself.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.d01-1722.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Metadata

Authors
Böckmann, R., Dickneite, C., Middendorf, B., Goebel, W., & Sokolovic, Z.
Affiliations
University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Goebel, Werner
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-11
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
643-653
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2122365028
Cited by
101
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Ulm
  • University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
PrfA, Listeria monocytogenes, transcriptional regulation, DNA binding, transcriptional activator, iron regulation, virulence gene regulation, strain differences, protein-DNA interactions
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Bacterial Toxins, Culture Media, DNA, Bacterial, Escherichia coli, Heat-Shock Proteins, Hemolysin Proteins, Humans, Iron, Listeria monocytogenes, Membrane Proteins, Peptide Termination Factors, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review