The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sulfadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization
Abstract
Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (Fansidar) is widely used in Africa for treating chloroquine‐resistant falciparum malaria. To clarify how parasite resistance to this combination arises, various lines of Plasmodium falciparum were used to investigate the role of naturally occurring mutations in the target enzyme, dihydropteroate synthetase (DHPS), in the parasite response to sulfadoxine inhibition. An improved drug assay was employed to identify a clear correlation between sulfadoxine‐resistance levels and the number of DHPS mutations. Moreover, tight linkage was observed between DHPS mutations and high‐level resistance in the 16 progeny of a genetic cross between sulfadoxine‐sensitive (HB3) and sulfadoxine‐resistant (Dd2) parents. However, we also demonstrate a profound influence of exogenous folate on IC 50 values, which, under physiological conditions, may have a major role in determining resistance levels. Importantly, this phenotype does not segregate with dhps genotypes in the cross, but shows complete linkage to the two alleles of the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) gene inherited from the parental lines. However, in unrelated lines, this folate effect correlates less well with DHFR sequence, indicating that the gene responsible may be closely linked to dhfr, rather than dhfr itself. These results have major implications for the acquisition of Fansidar resistance by malaria parasites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Resistance of Malaria Parasites to Antifolates
Gregson, A., & Plowe, C. V. (2005) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.57.1.4 · Cited by 499
Antimalarial drug resistance and combination chemotherapy
White, N. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0426 · Cited by 477
Triglia, T., Menting, J. G. T., Wilson, C., & Cowman, A. F. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13944 · Cited by 422
Nzila, A. M., Mberu, E. K., Sulo, J., Dayo, H., Winstanley, P. A., Sibley, C. H., & Watkins, W. M. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.4.991-996.2000 · Cited by 232
Kayentao, K., Kodio, M., Newman, R. D., Maiga, H., Doumtabe, D., Ongoiba, A., Coulibaly, D., Keita, A. S., Maiga, B., Mungai, M., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/426400 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, P., Read, M., Sims, P. F. G., & Hyde, J. E.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 979-986
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2137764200
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2821646.x
- The paper
- Wang, P., Read, M., Sims, P. F. G., & Hyde, J. E. (1997). Sulfadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2821646.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.