Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative proteome analysis of Helicobacter pylori

Open access
Jungblut, P. R., Bumann, D., Haas, G., Zimny‐Arndt, U., Holland, P., Lamer, S., Siejak, F., Aebischer, A., Meyer, T. F.·2000·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori, the causative agent of gastritis, ulcer and stomach carcinoma, infects approximately half of the worlds population. After sequencing the complete genome of two strains, 26695 and J99, we have approached the demanding task of investigating the functional part of the genetic information containing macromolecules, the proteome. The proteins of three strains of H. pylori, 26695 and J99, and a prominent strain used in animal models SS1, were separated by a high‐resolution two‐dimensional electrophoresis technique with a resolution power of 5000 protein spots. Up to 1800 protein species were separated from H. pylori which had been cultivated for 5 days on agar plates. Using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI‐MS) peptide mass fingerprinting we have identified 152 proteins, including nine known virulence factors and 28 antigens. The three strains investigated had only a few protein spots in common. We observe that proteins with an amino acid exchange resulting in a net change of only one charge are shifted in the two‐dimensional electrophoresis (2‐DE) pattern. The expression of 27 predicted conserved hypothetical open reading frames (ORFs) and six unknown ORFs were confirmed. The growth conditions of the bacteria were shown to have an effect on the presence of certain proteins. A preliminary immunoblotting study using human sera revealed that this approach is ideal for identifying proteins of diagnostic or therapeutic value. H. pylori 2‐DE patterns with their identified protein species were added to the dynamic 2D‐PAGE database (http://www.mpiib‐berlin.mpg.de/2D‐PAGE/). This basic knowledge of the proteome in the public domain will be an effective instrument for the identification of new virulence or pathogenic factors, and antigens of potentially diagnostic or curative value against H. pylori.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01896.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Jungblut, P. R., Bumann, D., Haas, G., Zimny‐Arndt, U., Holland, P., Lamer, S., Siejak, F., Aebischer, A., & Meyer, T. F.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
710-725
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2104756783
Cited by
239
References
2
FWCI
26.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative proteome analysis of Helicobacter pylori. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01896.x
The paper
Jungblut, P. R., Bumann, D., Haas, G., Zimny‐Arndt, U., Holland, P., Lamer, S., Siejak, F., Aebischer, A., & Meyer, T. F. (2000). Comparative proteome analysis of Helicobacter pylori. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01896.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.