The DOI matches its Crossref record.
α‐Enolase of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a plasmin(ogen)‐binding protein displayed on the bacterial cell surface
Abstract
Binding of human plasminogen to Streptococcus pneumoniae and its subsequent activation promotes penetration of bacteria through reconstituted basement membranes. In this study, we have characterized a novel pneumococcal surface protein with a molecular mass of 47 kDa, designated Eno, which specifically binds human plasmin(ogen), exhibits α‐enolase activity and is necessary for viability. Using enzyme assays, we have confirmed the α‐enolase activity of both pneumococcal surface‐displayed Eno and purified recombinant Eno protein. Immunoelectron microscopy indicated the presence of Eno in the cytoplasm as well as on the surface of encapsulated and unencapsulated pneumococci. Plasminogen‐binding activity was demonstrated with whole pneumococcal cells and purified Eno protein. Binding of activated plasminogen was also shown for Eno; however, the affinity for plasmin is significantly reduced compared with plasminogen. Results from competitive inhibition assays indicate that binding is mediated through the lysine binding sites in plasmin(ogen). Carboxypeptidase B treatment and amino acid substitutions of the C‐terminal lysyl residues of Eno indicated that the C‐terminal lysine is pivotal for plasmin(ogen)‐binding activity. Eno is ubiquitously distributed among pneumococcal serotypes, and binding experiments suggested the reassociation of secreted Eno to the bacterial cell surface. The reassociation was also confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy. The results suggest a mechanism of plasminogen activation for human pathogens that might contribute to their virulence potential in invasive infectious processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Streptococcus Adherence and Colonization
Nobbs, A. H., Lamont, R. J., & Jenkinson, H. F. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00014-09 · Cited by 657
Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Pneumococcal Meningitis
Mook-Kanamori, B. B., Geldhoff, M., van der Poll, T., & van de Beek, D. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00008-11 · Cited by 492
Dando, S. J., Mackay-Sim, A., Norton, R., Currie, B. J., St. John, J. A., Ekberg, J. A. K., Batzloff, M., Ulett, G. C., & Beacham, I. R. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00118-13 · Cited by 428
Protein moonlighting: what is it, and why is it important?
Jeffery, C. J. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0523 · Cited by 361
Housekeeping enzymes as virulence factors for pathogens
Pancholi, V., & Chhatwal, G. S. (2003) · International Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1078/1438-4221-00283 · Cited by 251
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergmann, S., Rohde, M., Chhatwal, G. S., & Hammerschmidt, S.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1273-1287
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2055212290
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: α‐Enolase of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a plasmin(ogen)‐binding protein displayed on the bacterial cell surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02448.x
- The paper
- Bergmann, S., Rohde, M., Chhatwal, G. S., & Hammerschmidt, S. (2001). α‐Enolase of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a plasmin(ogen)‐binding protein displayed on the bacterial cell surface. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02448.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.