The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum‐sensing signal molecule
Open accessAbstract
Many bacteria control gene expression in response to cell population density, and this phenomenon is called quorum sensing. In Gram‐negative bacteria, quorum sensing typically involves the production, release and detection of acylated homoserine lactone signalling molecules called autoinducers. Vibrio harveyi , a Gram‐negative bioluminescent marine bacterium, regulates light production in response to two distinct autoinducers (AI‐1 and AI‐2). AI‐1 is a homoserine lactone. The structure of AI‐2 is not known. We have suggested previously that V. harveyi uses AI‐1 for intraspecies communication and AI‐2 for interspecies communication. Consistent with this idea, we have shown that many species of Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria produce AI‐2 and, in every case, production of AI‐2 is dependent on the function encoded by the luxS gene. We show here that LuxS is the AI‐2 synthase and that AI‐2 is produced from S ‐adenosylmethionine in three enzymatic steps. The substrate for LuxS is S ‐ribosylhomocysteine, which is cleaved to form two products, one of which is homocysteine, and the other is AI‐2. In this report, we also provide evidence that the biosynthetic pathway and biochemical intermediates in AI‐2 biosynthesis are identical in Escherichia coli , Salmonella typhimurium , V. harveyi , Vibrio cholerae and Enterococcus faecalis . This result suggests that, unlike quorum sensing via the family of related homoserine lactone autoinducers, AI‐2 is a unique, ‘universal’ signal that could be used by a variety of bacteria for communication among and between species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria
Papenfort, K., & Bassler, B. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89 · Cited by 2,256
Self-citationCommunication among Oral Bacteria
Kolenbrander, P. E., Andersen, R. N., Blehert, D. S., Egland, P. G., Foster, J. S., & Palmer, R. J. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.486-505.2002 · Cited by 1,022
Bacteria–host communication: the language of hormones
Sperandio, V., Torres, A. G., Jarvis, B., Nataro, J. P., & Kaper, J. B. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1537100100 · Cited by 902
Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Rickard, A. H., Jakubovics, N. S., Chalmers, N. I., & Diaz, P. I. (2006) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00187.x · Cited by 791
LuxS quorum sensing: more than just a numbers game
Xavier, K. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2003) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00028-6 · Cited by 746
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schauder, S., Shokat, K., Surette, M. G., & Bassler, B. L.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 463-476
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2144640625
- Cited by
- 1,035
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum‐sensing signal molecule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02532.x
- The paper
- Schauder, S., Shokat, K., Surette, M. G., & Bassler, B. L. (2001). The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum‐sensing signal molecule. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02532.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.