The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose
Abstract
Summary: We report here a new screening method based on the fluorescence of colonies on calcofluor agar plates to identify transposon insertion mutants of Salmonella enteritidis that are defective in biofilm development. The results not only confirmed the requirement of genes already described for the modulation of multicellular behaviour in Salmonella typhimurium and other species, but also revealed new aspects of the biofilm formation process, such as two new genetic elements, named as bcs ABZC and bcs EFG operons, required for the synthesis of an exopolysaccharide, digestible with cellulase. Non‐polar mutations of bcs C and bcs E genes and complementation experiments demonstrated that both operons are respon‐sible for cellulose biosynthesis in both S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium. Using two different growth media, ATM and LB, we showed that the biofilm produced by S. enteritidis is made of different constituents, suggesting that biofilm composition and regulation depends on environmental conditions. Bacterial adherence and invasion assays of eukaryotic cells and in vivo virulence studies of cellulose‐deficient mutants indicated that, at least under our experimental conditions, the production of cellulose is not involved in the virulence of S. enteritidis. However, cellulose‐deficient mutants were more sensitive to chlorine treatments, suggesting that cellulose production and biofilm formation may be an important factor for the survival of S. enteritidis on surface environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heilmann, C., Hussain, M., Peters, G., & Götz, F. (1997) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x · Cited by 700
Cited by
Hobley, L., Harkins, C., MacPhee, C. E., & Stanley-Wall, N. R. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv015 · Cited by 581
“Further analysis of cellulose production by E. coli revealed that the proteins involved in cellulose synthesis are encoded in two divergent operons: yhjR - bcsQABZC and bcsEFG (Zogaj et al. 2001; Solano et al. 2002; Le Quere and Ghigo 2009).”
BackgroundBacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions
Römling, U., & Galperin, M. Y. (2015) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005 · Cited by 573
A Molecular Description of Cellulose Biosynthesis
McNamara, J. T., Morgan, J. L. W., & Zimmer, J. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930 · Cited by 382
Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production
Shoda, M., & Sugano, Y. (2005) · Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02931175 · Cited by 375
Evolvability and hierarchy in rewired bacterial gene networks
Isalan, M., Lemerle, C., Michalodimitrakis, K., Horn, C., Beltrao, P., Raineri, E., Garriga-Canut, M., & Serrano, L. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06847 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Solano, C., García, B., Valle, J., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Gamazo, C., & Lasa, I.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 793-808
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1952698703
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02802.x
- The paper
- Solano, C., García, B., Valle, J., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Gamazo, C., & Lasa, I. (2002). Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02802.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.