The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions
Open accessAbstract
Summary Recent studies of bacterial cellulose biosynthesis, including structural characterization of a functional cellulose synthase complex, provided the first mechanistic insight into this fascinating process. In most studied bacteria, just two subunits, BcsA and BcsB, are necessary and sufficient for the formation of the polysaccharide chain in vitro. Other subunits – which differ among various taxa – affect the enzymatic activity and product yield in vivo by modulating expression of biosynthesis apparatus, export of the nascent β-D-glucan polymer to the cell surface, and the organization of cellulose fibers into a higher-order structure. These auxiliary subunits play key roles in determining the quantity and structure of the resulting biofilm, which is particularly important for interactions of bacteria with higher organisms that lead to rhizosphere colonization and modulate virulence of cellulose-producing bacterial pathogens inside and outside of host cells. Here we review the organization of four principal types of cellulose synthase operons found in various bacterial genomes, identify additional bcs genes that encode likely components of the cellulose biosynthesis and secretion machinery, and propose a unified nomenclature for these genes and subunits. We also discuss the role of cellulose as a key component of biofilms formed by a variety of free-living and pathogenic bacteria and, for the latter, in the choice between acute infection and persistence in the host.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pfam: the protein families database
Finn, R. D., Bateman, A., Clements, J., Coggill, P., Eberhardt, R. Y., Eddy, S. R., Heger, A., Hetherington, K., Holm, L., Mistry, J., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223 · Cited by 6,148
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Cyclic di-GMP: the First 25 Years of a Universal Bacterial Second Messenger
Römling, U., Galperin, M. Y., & Gomelsky, M. (2013) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00043-12 · Cited by 1,700
Self-citationCellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,248
Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria
Ross, P., Mayer, R., & Benziman, M. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.1.35-58.1991 · Cited by 1,231
Microbial cellulose—the natural power to heal wounds
Czaja, W., Krystynowicz, A., Bielecki, S., & Brown, R. M. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.035 · Cited by 1,181
Zogaj, X., Nimtz, M., Rohde, M., Bokranz, W., & Römling, U. (2001) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02337.x · Cited by 955
Self-citationThe Cell Biology of Cellulose Synthesis
McFarlane, H. E., Döring, A., & Persson, S. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040240 · Cited by 623
Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation
Morgan, J. L. W., Strumillo, J., & Zimmer, J. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11744 · Cited by 610
Genetic analysis of Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation: critical role of cellulose
Solano, C., García, B., Valle, J., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Gamazo, C., & Lasa, I. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02802.x · Cited by 554
Cited by
Microbial composition of Kombucha determined using amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics
Arıkan, M., Mitchell, A. L., Finn, R. D., & Gürel, F. (2020) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.14992 · Cited by 123
Bacterial cellulose in cosmetic innovation: A review
Lima, N. F., Maciel, G. M., Lima, N. P., Fernandes, I. D. A. A., & Haminiuk, C. W. I. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133396 · Cited by 36
Three enzymes governed the rise of O2 on Earth
Mrnjavac, N., Degli Esposti, M., Mizrahi, I., Martin, W. F., & Allen, J. F. (2024) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2024.149495 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Römling, U., & Galperin, M. Y.
- Venue
- Trends in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 545-557
- ISSN
- 0966-842X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1816481481
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005
- The paper
- Römling, U., & Galperin, M. Y. (2015). Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.