The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The luxS gene is involved in cell–cell signalling for toxin production in Clostridium perfringens
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A Gram‐positive anaerobic pathogen, Clostridium perfringens, causes clostridial myonecrosis or gas gangrene in humans by producing numerous extracellular toxins and enzymes that act in concert to degrade host tissues. C. perfringens possesses a homologue of the luxS gene that is reported to be responsible for the production of autoinducer 2 (AI‐2), which participates in quorum sensing in bacteria. The luxS mutant was constructed using C. perfringens strain 13, and the role of the luxS gene in toxin production was examined. The cell‐free culture supernatant from wild‐type strain 13 greatly stimulated the luminescence of Vibrio harveyi BB170, whereas that from the luxS mutant caused no significant stimulation, indicating that the luxS gene is necessary for AI‐2 production in C. perfringens. The luxS mutant showed a reduced level of production of alpha‐, kappa‐ and theta‐toxins. In the luxS mutant, the transcription of the theta‐toxin gene (pfoA) was lower at mid‐exponential growth phase, whereas alpha‐ and kappa‐toxin gene transcription was not significantly affected. The production of toxins in the luxS mutant was stimulated by the addition of the culture supernatant from the wild‐type cells, possibly because of the presence of AI‐2. Moreover, the expression of the pfoA gene in the luxS mutant was apparently activated when the mutant cells were cultured in the presence of culture supernatants from the wild‐type C. perfringens, Escherichia coli DH5 α carrying the luxS gene of C. perfringens. A deletion analysis of the luxS operon showed that the luxS gene alone is responsible for cell–cell signalling, and that the metB or cysK genes located upstream of luxS are not involved in regulating toxin production. Our results indicate that cell–cell signalling by AI‐2 plays an important role in the regulation of toxin production in C. perfringens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
LuxS quorum sensing: more than just a numbers game
Xavier, K. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2003) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00028-6 · Cited by 746
A comparative genomic view of clostridial sporulation and physiology
Paredes, C. J., Alsaker, K. V., & Papoutsakis, E. T. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1288 · Cited by 342
Shrout, J. D., & Nerenberg, R. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203933h · Cited by 339
Sun, J., Daniel, R., Wagner-Döbler, I., & Zeng, A.-P. (2004) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-36 · Cited by 278
Pérez-Rodríguez, I., Bolognini, M., Ricci, J., Bini, E., & Vetriani, C. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.214 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohtani, K., Hayashi, H., & Shimizu, T.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-179
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2101222303
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The luxS gene is involved in cell–cell signalling for toxin production in Clostridium perfringens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02863.x
- The paper
- Ohtani, K., Hayashi, H., & Shimizu, T. (2002). The luxS gene is involved in cell–cell signalling for toxin production in Clostridium perfringens. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02863.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.