The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae
Abstract
Summary: Multiple quorum‐sensing circuits function in parallel to control virulence and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. In contrast to other bacterial pathogens that induce virulence factor production and/or biofilm formation at high cell density in the presence of quorum‐sensing autoinducers, V. cholerae represses these behaviours at high cell density. Consistent with this, we show here that V. cholerae strains ‘locked’ in the regulatory state mimicking low cell density are enhanced for biofilm production whereas mutants ‘locked’ in the regulatory state mimicking high cell density are incapable of producing biofilms. The quorum‐sensing cascade we have identified in V. cholerae regulates the transcription of genes involved in exopolysaccharide production (EPS), and variants that produce EPS and form biofilms arise at high frequency from non‐EPS, non‐biofilm producing strains. Our data show that spontaneous mutation of the transcriptional regulator hapR is responsible for this effect. Several toxigenic strains of V. cholerae possess a naturally occurring frameshift mutation in hapR. Thus, the distinct environments occupied by this aquatic pathogen presumably include niches where cell‐cell communication is crucial, as well as ones where loss of quorum sensing via hapR mutation confers a selective advantage. Bacterial biofilms could represent a complex habitat where such differentiation occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities
Lee, J.-H., & Lee, J. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00204.x · Cited by 1,059
Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms
Karatan, E., & Watnick, P. (2009) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00041-08 · Cited by 1,048
Biofilm Dispersal: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Potential Therapeutic Uses
Kaplan, J. B. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359403 · Cited by 949
Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal
McDougald, D., Rice, S. A., Barraud, N., Steinberg, P. D., & Kjelleberg, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2695 · Cited by 881
Nadell, C. D., Xavier, J. B., & Foster, K. R. (2009) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00150.x · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammer, B. K., & Bassler, B. L.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-20
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-104
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1927570869
- Cited by
- 886
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03688.x
- The paper
- Hammer, B. K., & Bassler, B. L. (2003). Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03688.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.