The DOI matches its Crossref record; 175 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sociobiology of biofilms
Abstract
Biofilms are densely packed communities of microbial cells that grow on surfaces and surround themselves with secreted polymers. Many bacterial species form biofilms, and their study has revealed them to be complex and diverse. The structural and physiological complexity of biofilms has led to the idea that they are coordinated and cooperative groups, analogous to multicellular organisms. We evaluate this idea by addressing the findings of microbiologists from the perspective of sociobiology, including theories of collective behavior (self-organization) and social evolution. This yields two main conclusions. First, the appearance of organization in biofilms can emerge without active coordination. That is, biofilm properties such as phenotypic differentiation, species stratification and channel formation do not necessarily require that cells communicate with one another using specialized signaling molecules. Second, while local cooperation among bacteria may often occur, the evolution of cooperation among all cells is unlikely for most biofilms. Strong conflict can arise among multiple species and strains in a biofilm, and spontaneous mutation can generate conflict even within biofilms initiated by genetically identical cells. Biofilms will typically result from a balance between competition and cooperation, and we argue that understanding this balance is central to building a complete and predictive model of biofilm formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Bacterial biofilms: from the Natural environment to infectious diseases
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W., & Stoodley, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro821 · Cited by 7,143
Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195131581.001.0001 · Cited by 6,435
Miller, M. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165 · Cited by 5,105
Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & William Costerton, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1 · Cited by 4,585
QUORUM SENSING: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria
Waters, C. M., & Bassler, B. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001 · Cited by 3,979
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
The Black Queen Hypothesis: Evolution of Dependencies through Adaptive Gene Loss
Morris, J. J., Lenski, R. E., & Zinser, E. R. (2012) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00036-12 · Cited by 1,208
Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3855-3 · Cited by 1,078
Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast
Gore, J., Youk, H., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07921 · Cited by 668
The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review
Monds, R. D., & O’Toole, G. A. (2009) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.11.001 · Cited by 532
Lawson, M. A. E., O’Neill, I. J., Kujawska, M., Gowrinadh Javvadi, S., Wijeyesekera, A., Flegg, Z., Chalklen, L., & Hall, L. J. (2020) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-019-0553-2 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadell, C. D., Xavier, J. B., & Foster, K. R.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 206-224
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2120350772
- Cited by
- 667
- References
- 175
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sociobiology of biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00150.x
- The paper
- Nadell, C. D., Xavier, J. B., & Foster, K. R. (2009). The sociobiology of biofilms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00150.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.