The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Astrocyte characterization in the multiple sclerosis glial scar
Abstract
Dense astrocytic scarring in chronic multiple sclerosis (MS) plaques produces an inhibitory environment which can impede tissue repair. Animal studies have shown that the antigenic phenotype of the most abundant cell type in the brain, the astrocyte, varies depending on astrocyte type and location. To identify the phenotype of scar astrocytes (SAs) in chronic lesions, markers of reactive astrocytes characterized in animal studies were investigated. To date these are the only established markers. Cerebral subventricular deep white matter from normal control, MS normal appearing white matter and lesions (acute, subacute and chronic) were examined by immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting. The antigenic profile of SAs revealed significant modification of astrocyte protein expression in chronic MS lesions. SAs express nestin, embryonic neural cell adhesion molecule, fibroblast growth factor receptor 4, epidermal growth factor receptor, nerve growth factor and a subpopulation of SAs also express basic fibroblast growth factor. These are in addition to the expected markers glial fibrillary acidic protein, vimentin, and the tenascins C and R. Therefore, an SA antigenic phenotype has now been defined. This knowledge may allow the development of therapeutic strategies that prevent scar formation and promote tissue repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Loss of aquaporin 4 in lesions of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis
Misu, T., Fujihara, K., Kakita, A., Konno, H., Nakamura, M., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, T., Nakashima, I., Takahashi, H., & Itoyama, Y. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm047 · Cited by 614
The P2X7 Receptor in Inflammatory Diseases: Angel or Demon?
Savio, L. E. B., de Andrade Mello, P., da Silva, C. G., & Coutinho-Silva, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00052 · Cited by 437
Oligodendrocyte, Astrocyte, and Microglia Crosstalk in Myelin Development, Damage, and Repair
Domingues, H. S., Portugal, C. C., Socodato, R., & Relvas, J. B. (2016) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2016.00071 · Cited by 432
SANDI: a compartment‐based model for non‐invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRI
Palombo, M., Ianus, A., Guerreri, M., Nunes, D., Alexander, D. C., Shemesh, N., & Zhang, H. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116835 · Cited by 349
Mechanisms of Disease: aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica
Jarius, S., Paul, F., Franciotta, D., Waters, P., Zipp, F., Hohlfeld, R., Vincent, A., & Wildemann, B. (2008) · Nature Clinical Practice Neurology · doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0764 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Holley, J. E., Gveric, D., Newcombe, J., Cuzner, M. L., & Gutowski, N. J.
- Venue
- Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 434-444
- ISSN
- 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2990
- OpenAlex
- W2007128839
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Astrocyte characterization in the multiple sclerosis glial scar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00491.x
- The paper
- Holley, J. E., Gveric, D., Newcombe, J., Cuzner, M. L., & Gutowski, N. J. (2003). Astrocyte characterization in the multiple sclerosis glial scar. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00491.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.