CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthInfant Development and Preterm Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breast feeding and cognitive development in childhood: a prospective birth cohort study

Oddy, Wendy H., Kendall, Garth E., Blair, Eve, De Klerk, Nicholas H., Stanley, Fiona J., Landau, Louis I., Silburn, S., Zubrick, Stephen·2003·Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00464.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary: The aim of this study was to examine prospectively the relation between duration of breast feeding and cognitive outcomes. A cohort study of 2860 children enrolled before birth provided data from 2393 term infants of English‐speaking mothers. Of these, complete infant feeding data in the first year of life and verbal cognitive IQ (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – PPVT‐R) were available for 1450 children at 6 years, and a performance subtest (Perceptual organisation WISC – Block Design) for 1375 children at 8 years. Full breast feeding was categorised as none,> 0 to < 4 months, 4–6 months and> 6 months. Associations between breast‐feeding duration and PPVT‐R at 6 years and Block Design at 8 years were estimated before and after adjustment for gender, gestational age, maternal age, maternal education, parental smoking and the presence of older siblings. The early cessation of full breast feeding was associated with reduced verbal IQ and the performance subtest. In unadjusted analysis, mean standardised PPVT‐R scores were 6.44 points greater (P < 0.0001) in children fully breast fed for> 6 months compared with those never breast fed. After adjustment, mean PPVT‐R scores were 3.56 points higher in children fully breast fed for> 6 months compared with those children never breast fed (P = 0.003). Similarly, Block Design scores were higher in those fully breast fed for> 6 months compared with those never breast fed in unadjusted (P = 0.001) but not adjusted analyses (P = 0.223). Interactions between maternal education (four levels) and breast feeding demonstrated a positive association of maternal education on verbal IQ (F = 2.64; P = 0.005) in children breast fed for longer but not on performance (F = 0.74; P = 0.67). The early introduction of milk other than breast milk was associated with reduced verbal IQ after adjustment for social and perinatal confounders. Although these effects were interacting with maternal education, they may act through undefined mechanisms in human milk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00464.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dunn L, 1981, PPVT‐R
  2. Wharton BA, 1992, Food for the brain, Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians, 22, 336
  3. World Health Organisation., 2001, The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding, Results of a WHO Systematic Review, 7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–173 of 173

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Oddy, W. H., Kendall, G. E., Blair, E., De Klerk, N. H., Stanley, F. J., Landau, L. I., Silburn, S., & Zubrick, S.
Affiliations
  • The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Oddy, Wendy H.
ORCID
Venue
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
81-90
ISSN
  • 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3016
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00464.x
OpenAlex
W1989782604
Cited by
173
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 30 d)
Locations
  • Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Healthway
  • Western Health Foundation
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
breastfeeding duration, infant feeding, cognitive development, verbal IQ, performance IQ, maternal education, breast milk, birth cohort, child cognitive outcomes
MeSH terms
Breast Feeding, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intelligence Tests, Male, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review