The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survey and synthesis of intra‐ and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit
Open accessAbstract
Responses of stomatal conductance (gs) to increasing vapour pressure deficit (D) generally follow an exponential decrease described equally well by several empirical functions. However, the magnitude of the decrease – the stomatal sensitivity – varies considerably both within and between species. Here we analysed data from a variety of sources employing both porometric and sap flux estimates of gs to evaluate the hypothesis that stomatal sensitivity is proportional to the magnitude of gs at low D (≤ 1 kPa). To test this relationship we used the function gs=gsref–m· ln D where m is the stomatal sensitivity and gsref=gs at D= 1 kPa. Regardless of species or methodology, m was highly correlated with gsref (average r2= 0·75) with a slope of approximately 0·6. We demonstrate that this empirical slope is consistent with the theoretical slope derived from a simple hydraulic model that assumes stomatal regulation of leaf water potential. The theoretical slope is robust to deviations from underlying assumptions and variation in model parameters. The relationships within and among species are close to theoretical predictions, regardless of whether the analysis is based on porometric measurements of gs in relation to leaf‐surface D (Ds), or on sap flux‐based stomatal conductance of whole trees (GSi), or stand‐level stomatal conductance (GS) in relation to D. Thus, individuals, species, and stands with high stomatal conductance at low D show a greater sensitivity to D, as required by the role of stomata in regulating leaf water potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
Xu, Z., & Zhou, G. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern185 · Cited by 891
The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and Functions F
Lucas, W. J., Groover, A., Lichtenberger, R., Furuta, K., Yadav, S., Helariutta, Y., He, X., Fukuda, H., Kang, J., Brady, S. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12041 · Cited by 772
Self-citationAn overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level
DAMOUR, G., SIMONNEAU, T., COCHARD, H., & URBAN, L. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x · Cited by 710
Garnier, E., & Navas, M.-L. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0036-y · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Oren, R., Sperry, J. S., Katul, G. G., Pataki, D. E., Ewers, B. E., Phillips, N., & Schäfer, K. V. R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1515-1526
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2101836973
- Cited by
- 1,264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey and synthesis of intra‐ and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00513.x
- The paper
- Oren, R., Sperry, J. S., Katul, G. G., Pataki, D. E., Ewers, B. E., Phillips, N., & Schäfer, K. V. R. (1999). Survey and synthesis of intra‐ and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00513.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.