The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine
Open accessAbstract
Recent work has shown that stomatal conductance (gs) and assimilation (A) are responsive to changes in the hydraulic conductance of the soil to leaf pathway (KL), but no study has quantitatively described this relationship under controlled conditions where steady‐state flow is promoted. Under steady‐state conditions, the relationship between gs, water potential (Ψ) and KL can be assumed to follow the Ohm's law analogy for fluid flow. When boundary layer conductance is large relative to gs, the Ohm's law analogy leads to gs=KL(Ψ soil−Ψ leaf)/D, where D is the vapour pressure deficit. Consequently, if stomata regulate Ψ leaf and limit A, a reduction in KL will cause gs and A to decline. We evaluated the regulation of Ψ leaf and A in response to changes in KL in well‐watered ponderosa pine seedlings (Pinus ponderosa). To vary KL, we systematically reduced stem hydraulic conductivity (k) using an air injection technique to induce cavitation while simultaneously measuring Ψ leaf and canopy gas exchange in the laboratory under constant light and D. Short‐statured seedlings (< 1 m tall) and hour‐long equilibration times promoted steady‐state flow conditions. We found that Ψ leaf remained constant near − 1·5 MPa except at the extreme 99% reduction of k when Ψ leaf fell to − 2·1 MPa. Transpiration,gs,A and KL all declined with decreasing k(P< 0·001). As a result of the near homeostasis in bulk Ψ leaf,gs and A were directly proportional to KL(R2> 0·90), indicating that changes in KL may affect plant carbon gain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., & Wright, I. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 · Cited by 3,069
Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants
Reddy, A. R., Chaitanya, K. V., & Vivekanandan, M. (2004) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013 · Cited by 2,327
Hacke, U. G., Sperry, J. S., Pockman, W. T., Davis, S. D., & McCulloh, K. A. (2001) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420100628 · Cited by 1,602
Self-citationMEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
The Plant Vascular System: Evolution, Development and Functions F
Lucas, W. J., Groover, A., Lichtenberger, R., Furuta, K., Yadav, S., Helariutta, Y., He, X., Fukuda, H., Kang, J., Brady, S. M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/jipb.12041 · Cited by 772
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubbard, R. M., Ryan, M. G., Stiller, V., & Sperry, J. S.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-121
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2171608029
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00660.x
- The paper
- Hubbard, R. M., Ryan, M. G., Stiller, V., & Sperry, J. S. (2001). Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00660.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.