The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat
Open accessAbstract
It emerged recently that there is an inter‐relationship between drought and ultraviolet‐B (UV‐B) radiation in plant responses, in that both stresses provoke an oxidative burst. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects and interaction of drought and UV‐B in wheat and pea. The absence of changes in relative leaf water content (RWC) after UV‐B treatments indicate that changes in water content were not involved. RWC was the main factor resulting in reduced growth in response to drought. Increases in anthocyanin and phenols were detected after exposure to UV‐B. The increases do not appear to be of sufficient magnitude to act as a UV‐B screen. UV‐B application caused greater membrane damage than drought stress, as assessed by lipid peroxidation as well as osmolyte leakage. An increase in the specific activities of antioxidant enzymes was measured after UV‐B alone as well as after application to droughted plants. Proline increased primarily in drought‐stressed pea or wheat. Proline may be the drought‐induced factor which has a protective role in response to UV‐B. The physiological and biochemical parameters measured indicate the UV‐B light has stronger stress effectors than drought on the growth of seedlings of both species. The two environmental stresses acted synergistically to induce protective mechanisms in that pre‐application of either stress reduced the damage caused by subsequent application of the other stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00018060 · Cited by 20,967
Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels
Beauchamp, C., & Fridovich, I. (1971) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8 · Cited by 12,892
Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone
Molina, M. J., & Rowland, F. S. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/249810a0 · Cited by 4,332
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Cited by
Johkan, M., Shoji, K., Goto, F., Hashida, S.-N., & Yoshihara, T. (2010) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.45.12.1809 · Cited by 624
Physiological responses of garden cress (L. sativum) to different types of microplastics
Pignattelli, S., Broccoli, A., & Renzi, M. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138609 · Cited by 394
Physiological mechanisms underlying OsNAC5-dependent tolerance of rice plants to abiotic stress
Song, S.-Y., Chen, Y., Chen, J., Dai, X.-Y., & Zhang, W.-H. (2011) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-011-1403-2 · Cited by 367
Srinivasan, R., Mageswari, A., Subramanian, P., Suganthi, C., Chaitanyakumar, A., Aswini, V., & Gothandam, K. M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25417-5 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexieva, V., Sergiev, I., Mapelli, S., & Karanov, E.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1337-1344
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2163776557
- Cited by
- 2,252
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00778.x
- The paper
- Alexieva, V., Sergiev, I., Mapelli, S., & Karanov, E. (2001). The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00778.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.