The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions?
Open accessAbstract
Osmolyte accumulation (OA) is frequently cited as a key putative mechanism for increasing yields of crops subjected to drought conditions. The hypothesis is that OA results in a number of benefits that sustain cell and tissue activity under water‐deficit conditions. It has been proposed as an effective tolerance mechanism for water deficits, which could be enhanced in crops by traditional plant breeding, marker‐assisted selection or genetic engineering, to generate drought‐tolerant crops. However, field studies examining the association between OA and crop yield have tended to show no consistent benefit. The few, often‐cited, investigations with positive associations were obtained under severe water deficits with extremely low yields or conditions with special water‐supply scenarios when much of the benefit is plant survival. Under conditions where water deficits threaten crop survival, yields are so low that even large fractional yield gains offer little practical benefit to growers. Indeed, the often‐cited benefit of turgor maintenance in cells is likely to result in crop behaviour that is exactly opposite to what is beneficial to crops. The one clear mechanism identified in this review for beneficial yield responses to OA is in the maintenance of root development in order to reach water that may be available deeper in the soil profile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance
Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2007) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006 · Cited by 4,776
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants
Valliyodan, B., & Nguyen, H. T. (2006) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.019 · Cited by 831
Abid, M., Ali, S., Qi, L. K., Zahoor, R., Tian, Z., Jiang, D., Snider, J. L., & Dai, T. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7 · Cited by 567
Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity
Chen, H., & Jiang, J.-G. (2010) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a10-014 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Serraj, R., & Sinclair, T. R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-341
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W1999380163
- Cited by
- 920
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00754.x
- The paper
- Serraj, R., & Sinclair, T. R. (2002). Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00754.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.