CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 141Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsLight effects on plantsLeaf Properties and Growth Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profiles of 14C fixation through spinach leaves in relation to light absorption and photosynthetic capacity

EVANS, J. R., VOGELMANN, T. C.·2003·Plant, Cell & Environment
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00985.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The profile of photosynthetic rate with depth through a leaf depends on the profiles of light absorption and photosynthetic capacity. Using a combination of several techniques, a comprehensive description of spinach leaves has been obtained. Profiles of CO 2 fixation were obtained by exposing leaves to 14 CO 2 for 10 s under blue or green light before freeze clamping and paradermal sectioning. Profiles of light absorption were measured on adjacent parts of the leaf by quantifying chlorophyll fluorescence images of the transversely cut face obtained when blue or green light was applied to the adaxial or abaxial surface. The profile of CO 2 fixation was modelled using the measured profiles of light absorption and photosynthetic capacity. There was remarkably good agreement between the observed and modelled CO 2 fixation profiles for the eight combinations of colour, orientation and irradiance tested. Gas exchange of an intact leaf was also measured concurrently with conventional chlorophyll fluorescence under blue or green light. These data were consistent with the multi‐layer leaf model with the exception of blue light applied to the abaxial surface, where chlorophyll fluorescence appeared to come from layers deeper than expected. Photosynthetic capacity matched the profile of green but not white light absorption through the leaf.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00985.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts.

    “In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts (Vogelmann and Evans, 2002; Evans and Vogelmann, 2003; Slattery et al., 2016).”

    From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Evans and Vogelmann, 2003

  • This has been shown to create a within-leaf gradient in photosynthesis as well as photoinhibition that decreases with depth in the leaf and limits overall photosynthetic efficiency.

    “This has been shown to create a within-leaf gradient in photosynthesis (Evans and Vogelmann, 2003) as well as photoinhibition (Oguchi et al., 2011) that decreases with depth in the leaf and limits overall photosynthetic efficiency.”

    From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Evans and Vogelmann, 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09189.x · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF00384257 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00206296 · DOI
  4. 10.1071/PP9870001 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01519.x · DOI
  6. 10.1071/PP9870069 · DOI
  7. 10.1071/PP9930069 · DOI
  8. 10.1071/PP9950865 · DOI
  9. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00440.x · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00195076 · DOI
  11. 10.1098/rstb.1989.0016 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90163-G · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/jxb/34.12.1676 · DOI
  15. 10.1104/pp.119.3.917 · DOI
  16. 10.1006/anbo.1998.0589 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb00639.x · DOI
  18. 10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400020002x · DOI
  19. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00563.x · DOI
  20. 10.2307/3869663 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF00195075 · DOI
  22. Oja V.M., 1976, Adaptation of the photosynthesis apparatus to the light profile in the leaf, Soviet Plant Physiology, 23, 381
  23. 10.1071/PP9750435 · DOI
  24. 10.1104/pp.111.3.867 · DOI
  25. 10.1023/A:1017952500015 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03077.x · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03078.x · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb09691.x · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb05558.x · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF00017758 · DOI
  31. SunJ.(1996)Photosynthetic Gradients across Spinach Leaves.PhD Thesis.University of Wyoming Laramie WY USA.
  32. 10.1093/pcp/pce001 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029298 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00271.x · DOI
  35. 10.1093/jxb/37.3.399 · DOI
  36. Terashima I., 1988, Effects of light and nitrogen nutrition on the organization of the photosynthetic apparatus in spinach, Plant and Cell Physiology., 29, 143
  37. Terashima I., 1984, Comparative photosynthetic properties of palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts of Camellia japonica L. Functional adjustment of the photosynthetic apparatus to light environment within a leaf, Plant and Cell Physiology, 25, 555
  38. Terashima I., 1985, Palisade tissue chloroplasts and spongy tissue chloroplasts in spinach: biochemical and ultrastructural differences, Plant and Cell Physiology, 26, 63
  39. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076971 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076672 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087034 · DOI
  42. 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00762.x · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb06076.x · DOI
  44. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00910.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00649.x · DOI
  46. 10.1098/rstb.1989.0020 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09173.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
EVANS, J. R., & VOGELMANN, T. C.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
EVANS, J. R.
ORCID
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
547-560
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00985.x
OpenAlex
W2093154495
Cited by
141
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3 d)
Locations
  • Plant Cell & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Biological Infrastructure
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Keywords
spinach leaves, CO2 fixation, optical absorption, photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf orientation, blue light, green light, gas exchange, 14CO2 labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review