The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state
Open accessAbstract
Suspension‐cultured tomato cells respond to yeast cell wall preparations with a rapid, transient alkalinization of the culture medium. Depending on the dose of the stimulus, the pH starts to increase after a lag period of about 0.5–2 min and reaches a transient maximum, up to 0.6 pH units above the initial value, after 2–4 min. Using this alkalinization response as a rapid and convenient assay, a sensitive perception system for small chitin fragments was revealed in the tomato cells. Chitin oligomers with four or more N‐acetylglucosamine residues stimulated the alkalinization response significantly at concentrations below 10 pM and half‐maximally at concentrations of 100 pM. About 10 000‐fold higher concentrations of the trimer, N,N′,N″‐triacetylchitotriose, were required to elicit similar responses. For up to 8 h after a first treatment with 10 nM of the tetramer, N,N′,N″,N‴‐tetraacetyl‐chitotetraose, cells did not respond to a second stimulation with any of the chitin fragments. Throughout this refractory period, however, cells remained fully responsive to preparations of fungal xylanase, another stimulus which induces a more permanent alkalinization after a lag phase of more than 2 min. The alkalinization response to these two qualitatively different stimuli was paralleled by the same characteristic changes in the pattern of protein phosphorylation, detected by in vivo pulse‐labelling with [32 P]phosphate for 30 sec. The onset of the alkalinization and of the changes in protein phosphorylation coincided in both cases, and both phenomena were blocked by the protein kinase inhibitor K‐252a. Although the mechanism underlying the extracellular pH increase is unknown, activation of the alkalinization response provides a sensitive and convenient assay to investigate early events in chemoperception of microbial signals by plant cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boller, T., & Felix, G. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 · Cited by 3,387
Self-citationSIGNALING IN THE ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS
Harrison, M. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749 · Cited by 785
El Hadrami, A., Adam, L. R., El Hadrami, I., & Daayf, F. (2010) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md8040968 · Cited by 783
Oligosaccharide signalling for defence responses in plant
Shibuya, N., & Minami, E. (2001) · Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1006/pmpp.2001.0364 · Cited by 527
Oligosaccharins: structures and signal transduction
C�t�, F., & Hahn, M. G. (1994) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00016481 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Felix, G., Regenass, M., & Boller, T.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-316
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1975497332
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020307.x
- The paper
- Felix, G., Regenass, M., & Boller, T. (1993). Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020307.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.