Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state

Open access
Felix, Georg, Regenass, Martin, Boller, Thomas·1993·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Suspension‐cultured tomato cells respond to yeast cell wall preparations with a rapid, transient alkalinization of the culture medium. Depending on the dose of the stimulus, the pH starts to increase after a lag period of about 0.5–2 min and reaches a transient maximum, up to 0.6 pH units above the initial value, after 2–4 min. Using this alkalinization response as a rapid and convenient assay, a sensitive perception system for small chitin fragments was revealed in the tomato cells. Chitin oligomers with four or more N‐acetylglucosamine residues stimulated the alkalinization response significantly at concentrations below 10 pM and half‐maximally at concentrations of 100 pM. About 10 000‐fold higher concentrations of the trimer, N,N′,N″‐triacetylchitotriose, were required to elicit similar responses. For up to 8 h after a first treatment with 10 nM of the tetramer, N,N′,N″,N‴‐tetraacetyl‐chitotetraose, cells did not respond to a second stimulation with any of the chitin fragments. Throughout this refractory period, however, cells remained fully responsive to preparations of fungal xylanase, another stimulus which induces a more permanent alkalinization after a lag phase of more than 2 min. The alkalinization response to these two qualitatively different stimuli was paralleled by the same characteristic changes in the pattern of protein phosphorylation, detected by in vivo pulse‐labelling with [32 P]phosphate for 30 sec. The onset of the alkalinization and of the changes in protein phosphorylation coincided in both cases, and both phenomena were blocked by the protein kinase inhibitor K‐252a. Although the mechanism underlying the extracellular pH increase is unknown, activation of the alkalinization response provides a sensitive and convenient assay to investigate early events in chemoperception of microbial signals by plant cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020307.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Felix, G., Regenass, M., & Boller, T.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-08
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
307-316
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1975497332
Cited by
461
References
0
FWCI
19.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020307.x
The paper
Felix, G., Regenass, M., & Boller, T. (1993). Specific perception of subnanomolar concentrations of chitin fragments by tomato cells: induction of extracellular alkalinization, changes in protein phosphorylation, and establishment of a refractory state. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020307.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.