The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SIGNALING IN THE ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS
Abstract
Many microorganisms form symbioses with plants that range, on a continuous scale, from parasitic to mutualistic. Among these, the most widespread mutualistic symbiosis is the arbuscular mycorrhiza, formed between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and vascular flowering plants. These associations occur in terrestrial ecosystems throughout the world and have a global impact on plant phosphorus nutrition. The arbuscular mycorrhiza is an endosymbiosis in which the fungus inhabits the root cortical cells and obtains carbon provided by the plant while it transfers mineral nutrients from the soil to the cortical cells. Development of the symbiosis involves the differentiation of both symbionts to create novel symbiotic interfaces within the root cells. The aim of this review is to explore the current understanding of the signals and signaling pathways used by the symbionts for the development of the AM symbiosis. Although the signal molecules used for initial communication are not yet known, recent studies point to their existence. Within the plant, there is evidence of arbuscular mycorrhiza-specific signals and of systemic signaling that influences phosphate-starvation responses and root development. The landmark cloning of three plant signaling proteins required for the development of the symbiosis has provided the first insights into a signaling pathway that is used by AM fungi and by rhizobia for their symbiotic associations with legumes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Nam, K. H., & Li, J. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00814-0 · Cited by 1,217
Cited by
THE ROLE OF ROOT EXUDATES IN RHIZOSPHERE INTERACTIONS WITH PLANTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS
Bais, H. P., Weir, T. L., Perry, L. G., Gilroy, S., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 · Cited by 4,682
Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms
Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W., & Rillig, M. C. (2007) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5 · Cited by 1,269
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
Roles for Rice Membrane Dynamics and Plasmodesmata during Biotrophic Invasion by the Blast Fungus
Kankanala, P., Czymmek, K., & Valent, B. (2007) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.106.046300 · Cited by 594
Kohlen, W., Charnikhova, T., Liu, Q., Bours, R., Domagalska, M. A., Beguerie, S., Verstappen, F., Leyser, O., Bouwmeester, H., & Ruyter-Spira, C. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.110.164640 · Cited by 509
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, M. J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-42
- ISSN
- 0066-4227 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-3251
- OpenAlex
- W2107491608
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SIGNALING IN THE ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749
- The paper
- Harrison, M. J. (2005). SIGNALING IN THE ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL SYMBIOSIS. Annual Review of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.