The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley—powdery mildew interaction
Open accessAbstract
Active oxygen species (AOS) are believed to have important roles in plants in general and in plant—pathogen interactions in particular. They are believed to be involved in signal transduction, cell wall reinforcement, hypersensitive response (HR) and phytoalexin production, and to have direct antimicrobial effects. Since current methods are inadequate for localizing AOS in intact plant tissue, most studies have been conducted using cell suspension culture/elicitors systems. 3,3‐diaminobenzidine (DAB) polymerizes instantly and locally as soon as it comes into contact with H 2 O 2 in the presence of peroxidase, and it was found that, by allowing the leaf to take up this substrate, in‐vivo and in‐situ detection of H 2 O 2 can be made at subcellular levels. This method was successfully used to detect H 2 O 2 in developing papillae and surrounding haloes (cell wall appositions) and whole cells of barley leaves interacting with the powdery mildew fungus. Thus, H 2 O 2 can be detected in the epidermal cell wall subjacent to the primary germ tube from 6 h after inoculation, and subjacent to the appressorium from 15 h. The earliest time point for observation of H 2 O 2 in relation to epidermal cells undergoing HR is 15 h after inoculation, first appearing in the zones of attachment to the mesophyll cells underneath, and eventually in the entire epidermal cell. Furthermore, it was observed that proteins in papillae and HR cells are cross‐linked, a process believed to be fuelled by H 2 O 2. This cross‐linking reinforces the apposition, presumably assisting the arrest of the pathogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Orozco-Cardenas, M., & Ryan, C. A. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.6553 · Cited by 836
Jambunathan, N. (2010) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-702-0_18 · Cited by 554
Jonak, C., Nakagami, H., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.045724 · Cited by 432
Kim, K. S., Min, J.-Y., & Dickman, M. B. (2008) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-21-5-0605 · Cited by 384
Reactive oxygen species and plant resistance to fungal pathogens
Lehmann, S., Serrano, M., L’Haridon, F., Tjamos, S. E., & Metraux, J.-P. (2015) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.08.027 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Thordal‐Christensen, H., Zhang, Z., Wei, Y., & Collinge, D. B.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1187-1194
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2015093208
- Cited by
- 2,675
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley—powdery mildew interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11061187.x
- The paper
- Thordal‐Christensen, H., Zhang, Z., Wei, Y., & Collinge, D. B. (1997). Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley—powdery mildew interaction. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11061187.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.