The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Recent research has implicated nitric oxide (NO) in the induction of the hypersensitive response (HR) during plant–pathogen interactions. Here we demonstrate that Arabidopsis suspension cultures generate elevated levels of NO in response to challenge by avirulent bacteria, and, using NO donors, show that these elevated levels of NO are sufficient to induce cell death in Arabidopsis cells independently of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We also provide evidence that NO‐induced cell death is a form of programmed cell death (PCD), requiring gene expression, and has a number of characteristics of PCD of mammalian cells: NO induced chromatin condensation and caspase‐like activity in Arabidopsis cells, while the caspase‐1 inhibitor, Ac‐YVAD‐CMK, blocked NO‐induced cell death. A well‐established second messenger mediating NO responses in mammalian cells is cGMP, produced by the enzyme guanylate cyclase. A specific inhibitor of guanylate cyclase blocked NO‐induced cell death in Arabidopsis cells, and this inhibition was reversed by the cell‐permeable cGMP analogue, 8Br‐cGMP, although 8Br‐cGMP alone did not induce cell death or potentiate NO‐induced cell death. This suggests that cGMP synthesis is required but not sufficient for NO‐induced cell death in Arabidopsis. In‐gel protein kinase assays showed that NO activates a potential mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), although a specific inhibitor of mammalian MAPK activation, PD98059, which blocked H 2 O 2‐induced cell death, did not inhibit the effects of NO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soluble guanylate cyclase: the forgotten sibling
Hobbs, A. J. (1997) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0165-6147(97)01137-1 · Cited by 274
Cited by
Nitric oxide signalling in plants
Neill, S. J., Desikan, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00804.x · Cited by 874
Self-citationDesikan, R., Griffiths, R., Hancock, J., & Neill, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252461999 · Cited by 710
Self-citationEarly Signaling Events Induced by Elicitors of Plant Defenses
Garcia-Brugger, A., Lamotte, O., Vandelle, E., Bourque, S., Lecourieux, D., Poinssot, B., Wendehenne, D., & Pugin, A. (2006) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi-19-0711 · Cited by 630
Controlled cell death, plant survival and development
Lam, E. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1358 · Cited by 554
NO news is good news for plants
Delledonne, M. (2005) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.002 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, A., Desikan, R., Hurst, R. D., Hancock, J. T., & Neill, S. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 667-677
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2063874654
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00911.x
- The paper
- Clarke, A., Desikan, R., Hurst, R. D., Hancock, J. T., & Neill, S. J. (2000). NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00911.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.