Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures

Open access
Clarke, Andrew, Desikan, Radhika, Hurst, Roger D., Hancock, John T., Neill, Steven J.·2000·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Recent research has implicated nitric oxide (NO) in the induction of the hypersensitive response (HR) during plant–pathogen interactions. Here we demonstrate that Arabidopsis suspension cultures generate elevated levels of NO in response to challenge by avirulent bacteria, and, using NO donors, show that these elevated levels of NO are sufficient to induce cell death in Arabidopsis cells independently of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We also provide evidence that NO‐induced cell death is a form of programmed cell death (PCD), requiring gene expression, and has a number of characteristics of PCD of mammalian cells: NO induced chromatin condensation and caspase‐like activity in Arabidopsis cells, while the caspase‐1 inhibitor, Ac‐YVAD‐CMK, blocked NO‐induced cell death. A well‐established second messenger mediating NO responses in mammalian cells is cGMP, produced by the enzyme guanylate cyclase. A specific inhibitor of guanylate cyclase blocked NO‐induced cell death in Arabidopsis cells, and this inhibition was reversed by the cell‐permeable cGMP analogue, 8Br‐cGMP, although 8Br‐cGMP alone did not induce cell death or potentiate NO‐induced cell death. This suggests that cGMP synthesis is required but not sufficient for NO‐induced cell death in Arabidopsis. In‐gel protein kinase assays showed that NO activates a potential mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), although a specific inhibitor of mammalian MAPK activation, PD98059, which blocked H 2 O 2‐induced cell death, did not inhibit the effects of NO.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00911.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Clarke, A., Desikan, R., Hurst, R. D., Hancock, J. T., & Neill, S. J.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
667-677
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2063874654
Cited by
409
References
1
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00911.x
The paper
Clarke, A., Desikan, R., Hurst, R. D., Hancock, J. T., & Neill, S. J. (2000). NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00911.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.