Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,532

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Construct design for efficient, effective and high‐throughput gene silencing in plants

Wesley, S. Varsha, Helliwell, Christopher A., Smith, Neil A., Wang, MingBo, Rouse, Dean T., Liu, Qing, Gooding, Paul S., Singh, Surinder P., Abbott, David, Stoutjesdijk, Peter A., Robinson, Simon P., Gleave, Andrew P., Green, Allan G., Waterhouse, Peter M.·2001·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Post‐transcriptional silencing of plant genes using anti‐sense or co‐suppression constructs usually results in only a modest proportion of silenced individuals. Recent work has demonstrated the potential for constructs encoding self‐complementary ‘hairpin’ RNA (hpRNA) to efficiently silence genes. In this study we examine design rules for efficient gene silencing, in terms of both the proportion of independent transgenic plants showing silencing, and the degree of silencing. Using hpRNA constructs containing sense/anti‐sense arms ranging from 98 to 853 nt gave efficient silencing in a wide range of plant species, and inclusion of an intron in these constructs had a consistently enhancing effect. Intron‐containing constructs (ihpRNA) generally gave 90–100% of independent transgenic plants showing silencing. The degree of silencing with these constructs was much greater than that obtained using either co‐suppression or anti‐sense constructs. We have made a generic vector, pHANNIBAL, that allows a simple, single PCR product from a gene of interest to be easily converted into a highly effective ihpRNA silencing construct. We have also created a high‐throughput vector, pHELLSGATE, that should facilitate the cloning of gene libraries or large numbers of defined genes, such as those in EST collections, using an in vitro recombinase system. This system may facilitate the large‐scale determination and discovery of plant gene functions in the same way as RNAi is being used to examine gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,532

Metadata

Authors
Wesley, S. V., Helliwell, C. A., Smith, N. A., Wang, M., Rouse, D. T., Liu, Q., Gooding, P. S., Singh, S. P., Abbott, D., Stoutjesdijk, P. A., Robinson, S. P., Gleave, A. P., Green, A. G., & Waterhouse, P. M.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
581-590
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1565824301
Cited by
1,532
References
1
FWCI
67.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construct design for efficient, effective and high‐throughput gene silencing in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.x
The paper
Wesley, S. V., Helliwell, C. A., Smith, N. A., Wang, M., Rouse, D. T., Liu, Q., Gooding, P. S., Singh, S. P., Abbott, D., Stoutjesdijk, P. A., Robinson, S. P., Gleave, A. P., Green, A. G., & Waterhouse, P. M. (2001). Construct design for efficient, effective and high‐throughput gene silencing in plants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.