The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construct design for efficient, effective and high‐throughput gene silencing in plants
Abstract
Summary: Post‐transcriptional silencing of plant genes using anti‐sense or co‐suppression constructs usually results in only a modest proportion of silenced individuals. Recent work has demonstrated the potential for constructs encoding self‐complementary ‘hairpin’ RNA (hpRNA) to efficiently silence genes. In this study we examine design rules for efficient gene silencing, in terms of both the proportion of independent transgenic plants showing silencing, and the degree of silencing. Using hpRNA constructs containing sense/anti‐sense arms ranging from 98 to 853 nt gave efficient silencing in a wide range of plant species, and inclusion of an intron in these constructs had a consistently enhancing effect. Intron‐containing constructs (ihpRNA) generally gave 90–100% of independent transgenic plants showing silencing. The degree of silencing with these constructs was much greater than that obtained using either co‐suppression or anti‐sense constructs. We have made a generic vector, pHANNIBAL, that allows a simple, single PCR product from a gene of interest to be easily converted into a highly effective ihpRNA silencing construct. We have also created a high‐throughput vector, pHELLSGATE, that should facilitate the cloning of gene libraries or large numbers of defined genes, such as those in EST collections, using an in vitro recombinase system. This system may facilitate the large‐scale determination and discovery of plant gene functions in the same way as RNAi is being used to examine gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
Cited by
Mao, Y.-B., Cai, W.-J., Wang, J.-W., Hong, G.-J., Tao, X.-Y., Wang, L.-J., Huang, Y.-P., & Chen, X.-Y. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1352 · Cited by 1,358
AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 (ARF2): a pleiotropic developmental regulator
Okushima, Y., Mitina, I., Quach, H. L., & Theologis, A. (2005) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02426.x · Cited by 398
Mora-García, S., Vert, G., Yin, Y., Caño-Delgado, A., Cheong, H., & Chory, J. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1174204 · Cited by 396
DNA METHYLATION AND EPIGENETICS
Bender, J. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141641 · Cited by 371
Lezhneva, L., Kiba, T., Feria‐Bourrellier, A., Lafouge, F., Boutet‐Mercey, S., Zoufan, P., Sakakibara, H., Daniel‐Vedele, F., & Krapp, A. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12626 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesley, S. V., Helliwell, C. A., Smith, N. A., Wang, M., Rouse, D. T., Liu, Q., Gooding, P. S., Singh, S. P., Abbott, D., Stoutjesdijk, P. A., Robinson, S. P., Gleave, A. P., Green, A. G., & Waterhouse, P. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 581-590
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1565824301
- Cited by
- 1,532
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 67.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construct design for efficient, effective and high‐throughput gene silencing in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.x
- The paper
- Wesley, S. V., Helliwell, C. A., Smith, N. A., Wang, M., Rouse, D. T., Liu, Q., Gooding, P. S., Singh, S. P., Abbott, D., Stoutjesdijk, P. A., Robinson, S. P., Gleave, A. P., Green, A. G., & Waterhouse, P. M. (2001). Construct design for efficient, effective and high‐throughput gene silencing in plants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.