Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development and commercial use of Bollgard®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality

Perlak, Frederick J., Oppenhuizen, Mark, Gustafson, Karen, Voth, Richard, Sivasupramaniam, Saku, Heering, David, Carey, Boyd, Ihrig, Robert A., Roberts, James K.·2001·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Bollgard®cotton is the trademark given to a number of varieties of cotton bio‐engineered to produce an insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt). When produced by the modified cotton plants, this protein controls certain lepidopterous cotton insect pests. Commercially available since 1996, these cotton varieties are purchased under a license agreement in which the growers pay a fee and agree to abide by the terms, which include a 1‐year license to use the technology and agreement to participate in an insect resistance management program. Today, Bollgard®cotton is grown on more than one‐third of all cotton acreage in the USA. This product has reduced cotton production costs and insecticide use by providing an effective alternative to chemical insecticides for the control of tobacco budworm,Heliothis virescens;cotton bollworm,Helicoverpa zea;and pink bollworm,Pectinophora gossypiella. The specificity and safety profile of the Bt protein produced in planta in cotton was maintained. It has retained its selectivity for lepidopterous insects and lacks the characteristics found in potential allergenic proteins. Fiber quality, the agronomic characteristics of the plant and seed composition remain unchanged. New cotton technology is being developed to provide improved insect control and a wider spectrum of activity. These future products could further reduce insecticide use in the production of cotton, while maintaining the high level of safety and reliability that has been demonstrated by five seasons of Bollgard®cotton use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01120.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Perlak, F. J., Oppenhuizen, M., Gustafson, K., Voth, R., Sivasupramaniam, S., Heering, D., Carey, B., Ihrig, R. A., & Roberts, J. K.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-09
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
489-501
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2132741598
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and commercial use of Bollgard®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01120.x
The paper
Perlak, F. J., Oppenhuizen, M., Gustafson, K., Voth, R., Sivasupramaniam, S., Heering, D., Carey, B., Ihrig, R. A., & Roberts, J. K. (2001). Development and commercial use of Bollgard®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01120.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.