The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and commercial use of Bollgard®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality
Abstract
Summary: Bollgard®cotton is the trademark given to a number of varieties of cotton bio‐engineered to produce an insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt). When produced by the modified cotton plants, this protein controls certain lepidopterous cotton insect pests. Commercially available since 1996, these cotton varieties are purchased under a license agreement in which the growers pay a fee and agree to abide by the terms, which include a 1‐year license to use the technology and agreement to participate in an insect resistance management program. Today, Bollgard®cotton is grown on more than one‐third of all cotton acreage in the USA. This product has reduced cotton production costs and insecticide use by providing an effective alternative to chemical insecticides for the control of tobacco budworm,Heliothis virescens;cotton bollworm,Helicoverpa zea;and pink bollworm,Pectinophora gossypiella. The specificity and safety profile of the Bt protein produced in planta in cotton was maintained. It has retained its selectivity for lepidopterous insects and lacks the characteristics found in potential allergenic proteins. Fiber quality, the agronomic characteristics of the plant and seed composition remain unchanged. New cotton technology is being developed to provide improved insect control and a wider spectrum of activity. These future products could further reduce insecticide use in the production of cotton, while maintaining the high level of safety and reliability that has been demonstrated by five seasons of Bollgard®cotton use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Five years of Bt cotton in China – the benefits continue
Pray, C. E., Huang, J., Hu, R., & Rozelle, S. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01401.x · Cited by 478
Huang, J., Mi, J., Lin, H., Wang, Z., Chen, R., Hu, R., Rozelle, S., & Pray, C. (2010) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-010-4036-y · Cited by 89
Baum, J. A., Sukuru, U. R., Penn, S. R., Meyer, S. E., Subbarao, S., Shi, X., Flasinski, S., Heck, G. R., Brown, R. S., & Clark, T. L. (2012) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1603/ec11207 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Perlak, F. J., Oppenhuizen, M., Gustafson, K., Voth, R., Sivasupramaniam, S., Heering, D., Carey, B., Ihrig, R. A., & Roberts, J. K.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 489-501
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2132741598
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and commercial use of Bollgard®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01120.x
- The paper
- Perlak, F. J., Oppenhuizen, M., Gustafson, K., Voth, R., Sivasupramaniam, S., Heering, D., Carey, B., Ihrig, R. A., & Roberts, J. K. (2001). Development and commercial use of Bollgard®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01120.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.