Cited by 86Insect Resistance and GeneticsInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlHemiptera Insect Studies

Cotton plants expressing a hemipteran-active Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein impact the development and survival of Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) nymphs

Baum, James A., Sukuru, Uma R., Penn, Stephen R., Meyer, Steven E., Subbarao, Shubha, Shi, Xiaohong, Flasinski, Stanislaw, Heck, Gregory R. +2 more·2012·Journal of Economic Entomology

Abstract

The plant bugs Lygus hesperus Knight (Hemiptera: Miridae) and L. lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) have emerged as economic pests of cotton in the United States. These hemipteran species are refractory to the insect control traits found in genetically modified commercial varieties of cotton. In this article, we report the isolation and characterization of a 35 kDa crystal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis, designated TIC807, which causes reduced mass gain and mortality of L. hesperus and L. lineolaris nymphs when presented in an artificial diet feeding assay. Cotton plants expressing the TIC807 protein were observed to impact the survival and development of L. hesperus nymphs in a concentration-dependent manner. These results, demonstrating in planta activity of a Lygus insecticidal protein, represent an important milestone in the development of cotton varieties protected from Lygus feeding damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1603/ec11207

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modified Cry51Aa2 protein (Cry51Aa2.834_16) protects cotton against feeding damage caused by hemipteran and thysanopteran pests.

    “An example is modified Cry51Aa2 protein (Cry51Aa2.834_16)that protects cotton against feeding damage caused by hemipteran and thysanopteran pests (Baum et al., 2012;Gowda et al., 2016;Bachman et al., 2017).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Baum et al., 2012

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baum, J. A., Sukuru, U. R., Penn, S. R., Meyer, S. E., Subbarao, S., Shi, X., Flasinski, S., Heck, G. R., Brown, R. S., & Clark, T. L.
Affiliations
Monsanto (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Economic Entomology
Published
2012-04-01
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
616-624
ISSN
0022-0493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146568189
Cited by
86
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
State of New Jersey Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hemiptera Insect Studies
Keywords
Lygus hesperus, Lygus lineolaris, Bacillus thuringiensis, crystal proteins, cotton pests, insecticidal proteins, nymphal development, nymph survival, mass gain, transgenic cotton, plant-insect interactions, Miridae
MeSH terms
Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins, Animals, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacterial Proteins, Gossypium, Diet, Endotoxins, Hemolysin Proteins, Nymph, Pest Control, Biological, Species Specificity, Heteroptera, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review