The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impaired sucrose‐induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar‐induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling
Abstract
Summary: Plants both produce and utilize carbohydrates and have developed mechanisms to regulate their sugar status and co‐ordinate carbohydrate partitioning. High sugar levels result in a feedback inhibition of photosynthesis and an induction of storage processes. We used a genetic approach to isolate components of the signalling pathway regulating the induction of starch biosynthesis. The regulatory sequences of the sugar inducible ADP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase subunit ApL3 were fused to a negative selection marker. Of the four impaired sucrose induction (isi) mutants described here, two (isi1 and isi2) were specific to this screen. The other two mutants (isi3 and isi4) showed additional phenotypes associated with sugar‐sensing screens that select for seedling establishment on high‐sugar media. The isi3 and isi4 mutants were found to be involved in the abscisic acid signalling pathway. isi3 is allelic to abscisic acid insensitive4 (abi4), a gene encoding an Apetala2‐type transcription factor; isi4 was found to be allelic to glucose insensitive1 (gin1) previously reported to reveal cross‐talk between ethylene and glucose signalling. Here we present an alternative interpretation of gin1 as an allele of the ABA‐deficient mutant aba2. Expression analysis showed that ABA is unable to induce ApL3 gene expression by itself, but greatly enhances ApL3 induction by sugar. Our data suggest a major role for ABA in relation to sugar‐signalling pathways, in that it enhances the ability of tissues to respond to subsequent sugar signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bae, J. M., & Liu, J. R. (1997) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/s004380050406 · Cited by 47
Cited by
RISING ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE: Plants FACE the Future
Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A., & Ort, D. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610 · Cited by 1,715
ABA and sugar interactions regulating development: cross-talk or voices in a crowd?
Finkelstein, R. R., & Gibson, S. I. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(01)00225-4 · Cited by 337
Hexose kinases and their role in sugar-sensing and plant development
Granot, D., David-Schwartz, R., & Kelly, G. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00044 · Cited by 260
Matiolli, C. C., Tomaz, J. P., Duarte, G. T., Prado, F. M., Del Bem, L. E. V., Silveira, A. B., Gauer, L., Corrêa, L. G. G., Drumond, R. D., Viana, A. J. C., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.181743 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Rook, F., Corke, F., Card, R., Munz, G., Smith, C., & Bevan, M. W.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 421-433
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1998119326
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impaired sucrose‐induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar‐induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.2641043.x
- The paper
- Rook, F., Corke, F., Card, R., Munz, G., Smith, C., & Bevan, M. W. (2001). Impaired sucrose‐induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar‐induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.2641043.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.