Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impaired sucrose‐induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar‐induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling

Rook, Fred, Corke, Fiona, Card, Roderick, Munz, Georg, Smith, Caroline, Bevan, Michael W.·2001·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Plants both produce and utilize carbohydrates and have developed mechanisms to regulate their sugar status and co‐ordinate carbohydrate partitioning. High sugar levels result in a feedback inhibition of photosynthesis and an induction of storage processes. We used a genetic approach to isolate components of the signalling pathway regulating the induction of starch biosynthesis. The regulatory sequences of the sugar inducible ADP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase subunit ApL3 were fused to a negative selection marker. Of the four impaired sucrose induction (isi) mutants described here, two (isi1 and isi2) were specific to this screen. The other two mutants (isi3 and isi4) showed additional phenotypes associated with sugar‐sensing screens that select for seedling establishment on high‐sugar media. The isi3 and isi4 mutants were found to be involved in the abscisic acid signalling pathway. isi3 is allelic to abscisic acid insensitive4 (abi4), a gene encoding an Apetala2‐type transcription factor; isi4 was found to be allelic to glucose insensitive1 (gin1) previously reported to reveal cross‐talk between ethylene and glucose signalling. Here we present an alternative interpretation of gin1 as an allele of the ABA‐deficient mutant aba2. Expression analysis showed that ABA is unable to induce ApL3 gene expression by itself, but greatly enhances ApL3 induction by sugar. Our data suggest a major role for ABA in relation to sugar‐signalling pathways, in that it enhances the ability of tissues to respond to subsequent sugar signals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.2641043.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
Rook, F., Corke, F., Card, R., Munz, G., Smith, C., & Bevan, M. W.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-05
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
421-433
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1998119326
Cited by
421
References
1
FWCI
29.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impaired sucrose‐induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar‐induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.2641043.x
The paper
Rook, F., Corke, F., Card, R., Munz, G., Smith, C., & Bevan, M. W. (2001). Impaired sucrose‐induction mutants reveal the modulation of sugar‐induced starch biosynthetic gene expression by abscisic acid signalling. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.2641043.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.