Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NPP1, a Phytophthora ‐associated trigger of plant defense in parsley and Arabidopsis

Fellbrich, Guido, Romanski, Annette, Varet, Anne, Blume, Beatrix, Brunner, Frédéric, Engelhardt, Stefan, Felix, Georg, Kemmerling, Birgit, Krzymowska, Magdalena, Nürnberger, Thorsten·2002·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Activation of non‐cultivar‐specific plant defense against attempted microbial infection is mediated through the recognition of pathogen‐derived elicitors. Previously, we have identified a peptide fragment (Pep‐13) within a 42‐kDa cell wall transglutaminase from various Phytophthora species that triggers a multifacetted defense response in parsley cells. Many of these oomycete species have now been shown to possess another cell wall protein (24 kDa), that evoked the same pattern of responses in parsley as Pep‐13. Unlike Pep‐13, necrosis‐inducing Phytophthora protein 1 (NPP1) purified from P. parasitica also induced hypersensitive cell death‐like lesions in parsley. NPP1 structural homologs were found in oomycetes, fungi, and bacteria, but not in plants. Structure–activity relationship studies revealed the intact protein as well as two cysteine residues to be essential for elicitor activity. NPP1‐mediated activation of pathogen defense in parsley does not employ the Pep‐13 receptor. However, early induced cellular responses implicated in elicitor signal transmission (increased levels of cytoplasmic calcium, production of reactive oxygen species, MAP kinase activation) were stimulated by either elicitor, suggesting the existence of converging signaling pathways in parsley. Infiltration of NPP1 into leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana Col‐0 plants resulted in transcript accumulation of pathogenesis‐related ( PR ) genes, production of ROS and ethylene, callose apposition, and HR‐like cell death. NPP1‐mediated induction of the PR1 gene is salicylic acid‐dependent, and, unlike the P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000( avrRpm1 )‐induced PR1 gene expression, requires both functional NDR1 and PAD4. In summary, Arabidopsis plants infiltrated with NPP1 constitute an experimental system that is amenable to forward genetic approaches aiming at the dissection of signaling pathways implicated in the activation of non‐cultivar‐specific plant defense.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01454.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Fellbrich, G., Romanski, A., Varet, A., Blume, B., Brunner, F., Engelhardt, S., Felix, G., Kemmerling, B., Krzymowska, M., & Nürnberger, T.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-31
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
375-390
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2152643698
Cited by
297
References
2
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NPP1, a Phytophthora ‐associated trigger of plant defense in parsley and Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01454.x
The paper
Fellbrich, G., Romanski, A., Varet, A., Blume, B., Brunner, F., Engelhardt, S., Felix, G., Kemmerling, B., Krzymowska, M., & Nürnberger, T. (2002). NPP1, a Phytophthora ‐associated trigger of plant defense in parsley and Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01454.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.