Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for an association between hookworm infection and cognitive function in Indonesian school children

Sakti, Hastaning, Nokes, Catherine, Subagio Hertanto, W., Hendratno, Sri, Hall, Andrew, Bundy, Donald A. P., Satoto·1999·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary The association between helminth infection and cognitive and motor function was investigated in school‐age children in Java, Indonesia. 432 children from 42 primary schools participated in the study. Children were stratified by age and sex into two age groups, 8–9 years and 11–13 years. Children infected with hookworm performed significantly worse than children without hookworm infection in 6 of the 14 cognitive or motor tests. After controlling for school (as a random effect) plus age, socio‐economic status and parental education, sex, stunting (height‐for‐age < − 2sd), body mass index, haemoglobin concentration and the presence of A. lumbricoide s and T. trichiura infections, infection with hookworm explained significantly lower scores on tests of Fluency (P < 0.01), Digit‐Span Forwards (P < 0.01), Number Choice (P < 0.01), Picture Search (P < 0.03), Stroop Colour Word (P < 0.02) and Mazes (P < 0.001). In 4 of the 6‐tests (Fluency, Number Choice, Picture Search and Mazes), there was a significant interaction between hookworm infection and age (P < 0.03), indicating that the association between hookworm and lower test scores increased with age. No associations were observed between hookworm infection and scores in tests of Digit‐Span Backwards, Corsi‐Block, Stroop Colour, Stroop Interference, Free Recall, Verbal Analogies, Bead Threading or the Pegboard (P > 0.05). Tests associated with helminths represented various functions of working memory. No significant associations between helminth infection and motor function were observed that could not be explained by chance. The results suggest that hookworm infection can have a significant adverse effect on children's working memory which may have consequences for a child's reasoning ability and reading comprehension. Although the results are only associational, the fact that differences in cognition were observed at baseline imply that preventing infection with helminths in school‐age children could be of benefit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00410.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Sakti, H., Nokes, C., Subagio Hertanto, W., Hendratno, S., Hall, A., Bundy, D. A. P., & Satoto
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
322-334
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2035623441
Cited by
216
References
1
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for an association between hookworm infection and cognitive function in Indonesian school children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00410.x
The paper
Sakti, H., Nokes, C., Subagio Hertanto, W., Hendratno, S., Hall, A., Bundy, D. A. P., & Satoto. (1999). Evidence for an association between hookworm infection and cognitive function in Indonesian school children. Tropical Medicine & International Health. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.1999.00410.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.