The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The phenomenon of treatment failures in Human African Trypanosomiasis
Abstract
Treatment of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT or sleeping sickness) relies on a few drugs which are old, toxic and expensive. The most important drug for the treatment of second stage infection is melarsoprol. During the last 50 years treatment failures with melarsoprol were not a major problem in Trypanosoma brucei gambiense patients. Commonly a relapse rate of 5–8% was reported, but in recent years it has increased dramatically in some important foci of T. b. gambiense sleeping sickness. Treatment failures for T. b. rhodesiense are much less of a problem apart from some reports between 1960 and 1985 of refractoriness in T. b. rhodesiense patients in East Africa. Analysis of those isolates revealed that their in vitro sensitivity to melarsoprol was one‐tenth that of sensitive isolates, and complete failure to cure the infection in the acute mouse model with melarsoprol levels comparable with those in human patients. There was very little indication of resistance in T. b. gambiense isolates from Côte d’Ivoire and NW Uganda. The in vitro melarsoprol sensitivities for populations from relapsing and from curable patients were in the same range. Melarsoprol concentrations in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients 24 h after treatment did not show any difference between patients who relapsed and those who could be cured. The reason for relapses in the recent T. b. gambiense epidemics are not known. Other parasite‐related factors might be involved, e.g. affinity to extravascular sites other than the CNS which are less accessible to the drug. In conclusion, a combination of factors rather than a single one may be responsible for the phenomenon of melarsoprol treatment failures in T. b. gambiense patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brun, R., Blum, J., Chappuis, F., & Burri, C. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60829-1 · Cited by 926
Self-citationBarrett, M. P., Burchmore, R. J., Stich, A., Lazzari, J. O., Frasch, A. C., Cazzulo, J. J., & Krishna, S. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14694-6 · Cited by 656
Human African trypanosomiasis: pharmacological re‐engagement with a neglected disease
Barrett, M. P., Boykin, D. W., Brun, R., & Tidwell, R. R. (2007) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707354 · Cited by 338
Self-citationDrugs and drug resistance in African trypanosomiasis
DELESPAUX, V, & DEKONING, H. (2007) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2007.02.004 · Cited by 288
Pentamidine uptake and resistance in pathogenic protozoa: past, present and future
Bray, P. G., Barrett, M. P., Ward, S. A., & de Koning, H. P. (2003) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4922(03)00069-2 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Brun, R., Schumacher, R., Schmid, C., Kunz, C., & Burri, C.
- Venue
- Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 906-914
- ISSN
- 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3156
- OpenAlex
- W1979094234
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phenomenon of treatment failures in Human African Trypanosomiasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00775.x
- The paper
- Brun, R., Schumacher, R., Schmid, C., Kunz, C., & Burri, C. (2001). The phenomenon of treatment failures in Human African Trypanosomiasis. Tropical Medicine & International Health. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00775.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.