The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural products as sources of herbicides: current status and future trends
Abstract
Although natural product‐based discovery strategies have not been as successful for herbicides as for other pesticides or pharmaceuticals, there have been some notable successes. Phosphinothricin, the biosynthetic version of glufosinate, and bialaphos are phytotoxic microbial products that have yielded commercial herbicides. Cinmethylin, a herbicidal analogue of cineole, has been sold in Europe and Asia. The triketone herbicides are derivatives of the plant‐produced phytotoxin leptospermone. These products represent only a small fraction of commercialized herbicides, but they have each introduced a novel molecular target site for herbicides. Analysis of the literature reveals that phytotoxic natural products act on a large number of unexploited herbicide target sites. The pesticide industry’s natural product discovery efforts have so far concentrated on microbially derived phytotoxins, primarily from non‐pathogenic soil microbes, involving the screening of large numbers of exotic isolates. Plant pathogens usually produce potent phytotoxins, yet they have received relatively little attention. Even less effort has been made to discover plant‐derived phytotoxins. Bioassay‐directed isolation has been the preferred method of discovery after a producing organism is selected. This laborious approach often leads to rediscovery of known compounds. Modern tandem separation/chemical characterization instrumentation can eliminate much of this problem by identification of compounds before they are bioassayed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Duke, M. V., Paul, R. N., Elsohly, H. N., Sturtz, G., & Duke, S. O. (1994) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/297173 · Cited by 252
Differential accumulation of isoprenoids in glanded and glandless Artemisia annua L
Tellez, M. R., Canel, C., Rimando, A. M., & Duke, S. O. (1999) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(99)00308-8 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Allelopathy of Aquatic Autotrophs
Gross, E. M. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713610859 · Cited by 659
Challenges and opportunities in implementing allelopathy for natural weed management
Bhowmik, P. C., & Inderjit (2003) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/s0261-2194(02)00242-9 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Duke, Dayan, Romagni, & Rimando
- Venue
- Weed Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-111
- ISSN
- 0043-1737 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3180
- OpenAlex
- W2101831798
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural products as sources of herbicides: current status and future trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00161.x
- The paper
- Duke, Dayan, Romagni, & Rimando. (2000). Natural products as sources of herbicides: current status and future trends. Weed Research. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00161.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.