Cited by 140Skin Protection and AgingTextile materials and evaluationsDyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

Clothing as protection from ultraviolet radiation: which fabric is most effective?

Davis, Sandra, Capjack, Linda, Kerr, Nancy, Fedosejcvs, Robert·1997·International Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background With increasing levels of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in the earth's near environment and evidence that exposure to UVR contributes to skin cancer, cataracts, and photoaging, protection of the skin is imperative during exposure to the sun. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of various fabrics in screening UVR and to determine if specific characteristics of fabric are directly related to the amount of protection provided. Methods Transmission of UVR was measured using spectrophotometric techniques. This transmission, as a function of wavelength over the range 250–400 nm, was weighted with solar and biological spectral data to determine a “sun protection factor” (SPF) for each fabric. Results The transmission of UVR through fabric depends on the wavelength and varies with factors such as type of fiber, fabric mass, cover, and color. Conclusions Of 28 white fabrics tested, 19 offered less protection than a sunscreen with SPF 15, Polyester fabrics offered increased protection over cotton. The presence of dyes increased protection considerably.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00046.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In much summer clothing, polyester can be combined with other materials to deliver both comfort and superior UV protection.

    “In much summer clothing, polyester can be combined with other materials to deliver both comfort and superior UV protection (18).”
  • Tightness of the weave or knit is a major determinant factor of UPF.

    “Lastly, tightness of the weave or knit is a major determinant factor (18,21).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 140

Authors
Davis, S., Capjack, L., Kerr, N., & Fedosejcvs, R.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
374-379
ISSN
  • 0011-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-4632
OpenAlex
W1975850930
Cited by
140
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
Keywords
ultraviolet radiation, clothing, sun protection factor, skin protection, polyester fabric, cotton fabric, fabric color, fabric weight
MeSH terms
Animals, Bedding and Linens, Cellulose, Clothing, Color, Gossypium, Humans, Nylons, Polyesters, Radiation Protection, Textiles, Ultraviolet Rays, Wool

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review